* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 16.1355

Thu Apr 28 2005

Books: Philosophy of Lang/Semantics: Potts

Editor for this issue: Megan Zdrojkowski <meganlinguistlist.org>

Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
        1.    Lowri Jones, The Logic of Conventional Implicatures: Potts

Message 1: The Logic of Conventional Implicatures: Potts
Date: 27-Apr-2005
From: Lowri Jones <lowri.jonesoup.com>
Subject: The Logic of Conventional Implicatures: Potts

Title: The Logic of Conventional Implicatures
Series Title: Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics No. 7
Published: 2005
Publisher: Oxford University Press

Book URL: http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-927383-9

Author: Christopher Potts, University of Massachusetts
Hardback: ISBN: 0199273820 Pages: 258 Price: U.K. £ 55.00
Paperback: ISBN: 0199273839 Pages: 258 Price: U.K. £ 21.99

This book revives the study of conventional implicatures in natural
language semantics. H. Paul Grice first defined the concept. Since then his
definition has seen much use and many redefinitions, but it has never
enjoyed a stable place in linguistic theory. Christopher Potts returns to
the original and uses it as a key into two presently under-studied areas of
natural language: supplements (appositives, parentheticals) and expressives
(e.g., honorifics, epithets). The account of both depends on a theory in
which sentence meanings can be multidimensional. The theory is logically
and intuitively compositional, and it minimally extends a familiar kind of
intensional logic, thereby providing an adaptable, highly useful tool for
semantic analysis. The result is a linguistic theory that is accessible not
only to linguists of all stripes, but also philosophers of language,
logicians, and computer scientists who have linguistic applications in mind.

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
                            Philosophy of Language

Written In: English (ENG )

See this book announcement on our website:

-------------------------- Major Supporters --------------------------
Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.org
Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Elsevier Ltd. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/linguistics
Equinox Publishing Ltd. http://www.equinoxpub.com/
Georgetown University Press http://www.press.georgetown.edu
Hodder Arnold http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates http://www.erlbaum.com/
Lincom GmbH http://www.lincom-europa.com
MIT Press http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Mouton de Gruyter http://www.mouton-publishers.com
Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us
Rodopi http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/

---------------------- Other Supporting Publishers ----------------------
Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc., Umass http://glsa.hypermart.net/
International Pragmatics Assoc. http://ipra-www.uia.ac.be/ipra/
Kingston Press Ltd http://www.kingstonpress.com/
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl/
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Pacific Linguistics http://pacling.anu.edu.au/
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com
SIL International http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd. http://www.stjerome.co.uk
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics / LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistic http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/


Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.