* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 16.1432

Thu May 05 2005

Disc: Re: A Challenge to the Minimalist Community

Editor for this issue: Michael Appleby <michaellinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    John Goldsmith, Re: A Challenge to the Minimalist Community

Message 1: Re: A Challenge to the Minimalist Community
Date: 03-May-2005
From: John Goldsmith <goldsmithuchicago.edu>
Subject: Re: A Challenge to the Minimalist Community

Just a brief comment on a remark made by Ash Asudeh: 

"All grammars, those used in statistical parsing or otherwise, attempt
to reject ungrammatical sentences: Nobody wants their
grammar/parser to overgenerate. Even if the claim is true of statistical
parsers (I don't think it is), it certainly isn't true of the LFG and HPSG
parsers and grammars noted above."

That's not quite right. There is not universal agreement to the position
that the ability to distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical
sentences is an important function to be able to model directly,
whether we are looking at humans or at software. There are certainly
various serious parsing systems whose goal is to be able to parse, as
best they can, any linguistic material that is given to them -- and
arguably, that is what we speakers do too. I think of Microsoft
Research's NLPWin parser as an example of such a system.

Needless to say, the disagreement about this point brings into play a
lot of very serious questions, and I think both sides of the question I
mentioned take reasonable positions -- but my point here is to
emphasize that Ash Sudeh's point represents one side of an issue,
not both sides.

Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
                            Discipline of Linguistics

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.