LINGUIST List 16.1465
|
Mon May 09 2005
FYI: Acquisition Methodology Workshop (EMLAR II)
Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer
<sawyer linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Sharon
Unsworth,
Acquisition Methodology Workshop (EMLAR II)
Message 1: Acquisition Methodology Workshop (EMLAR II)
|
Date: 09-May-2005
From: Sharon Unsworth <sharon.unsworth let.uu.nl>
Subject: Acquisition Methodology Workshop (EMLAR II)
EMLAR II *** REGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN!! After the success of EMLAR I, the Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT) will hold its second 2-day workshop on the issue of Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research. EMLAR II is for PhD and advanced MA-students (other researchers are in principle welcome as well) with lectures and smaller interactive sessions on the different methodologies used in language acquisition research. This year's program consists of a series of nine lectures, each on a different method, and six smaller hands-on sessions. In addition, all tutors, who are experienced researchers, will make themselves available for individual consultations. To view the program, please visit: http://www.let.uu.nl/~Sharon.Unsworth/personal/emlarII.htm EMLAR II will be held November 16th and 17th 2005 at Utrecht University, The Netherlands. The workshop is free for members of LOT. The fee for participants from institutes and universities that are not part of LOT is 50 euros. This includes access to the entire program, beverages and a reception. Registration is NOW OPEN and will continue until October 2005. Please note that there will be a limited number of places for the smaller sessions. These will be assigned on a first come, first served basis. Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|