LINGUIST List 16.1899
|
Mon Jun 20 2005
Diss: Socioling/Morphology: Sanchez: 'Constraints ...'
Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui
<tako linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Tara
Sanchez,
Constraints on Structural Borrowing in a Multilingual Contact Situation
Message 1: Constraints on Structural Borrowing in a Multilingual Contact Situation
|
Date: 18-Jun-2005
From: Tara Sanchez <sanch131msu.edu>
Subject: Constraints on Structural Borrowing in a Multilingual Contact Situation
Institution: University of Pennsylvania
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2005
Author: Tara Sanchez
Dissertation Title: Constraints on Structural Borrowing in a Multilingual Contact Situation
Linguistic Field(s):
Morphology
Sociolinguistics
Subject Language(s): Papiamentu (PAE)
Dissertation Director:
Rolf Noyer
Ellen F Prince
Gillian Sankoff
Dissertation Abstract:
Many principles of structural borrowing have been proposed, all under
qualitative theories. Some argue that linguistic conditions must be met
for borrowing to occur ('universals' of borrowing); others argue that
aspects of the socio-demographic situation are sometimes more relevant than
linguistic considerations (e.g. Thomason and Kaufman 1988). This
dissertation evaluates the roles of both linguistic and social factors in
structural borrowing from a quantitative, variationist perspective via a
diachronic and ethnographic examination of the language contact situation
on Aruba, Bonaire, and Curaçao, where the Iberian creole, Papiamentu, is in
contact with Spanish, Dutch, and English. Data are from texts (n=171)
dating 1776-1999 and sociolinguistic interviews (n=129) collected in 2003
by the author, a non-native speaker of Papiamentu. The periphrastic
progressive (marked by ndo), the passive construction (wordu, ser, keda
alternate as passivizing verbs), and focus fronting (marked by ta) are
examined. In addition, variationist methods were applied in a novel way to
the system of verbal morphology in an effort to systematically assess the
effect of those borrowing 'universals' which refer to the grammar as a
whole (e.g. 'grammatical gaps are filled by borrowing') on the forms which
were eventually borrowed.
At the systemic level, linguistic factors are primarily responsible for
determining what will be borrowed and what will not. Some 'universals' of
structural borrowing are shown to have merit, such as 'structural
compatibility', 'morphological renewal' and 'convergence'. However,
'grammatical gaps' are not filled by borrowing. Only one non-linguistic
factor was significant, and implicates indirectly that the longer speakers
are bilingual, the more likely they are to borrow verbal morphology.
However, none of the other social and demographic factors quantified here
were significant. So for example, observed changes in 'amount and degree
of bilingualism' as measured by census reports were not correlated with
increased integration of foreign forms. Well-integrated foreign forms such
as the individual variables studied here may become sociolinguistic
variables. This is seen at first in the language contact factors (i.e.
dealing with individual speakers' proficiency in, attitudes toward, and use
of the various languages in contact), which may be quantitatively stronger
constraints than linguistic factors. Eventually, the variables may become
sensitive to social factors traditionally significant in monolingual
communities (such as social class, gender, etc.). At this point,
borrowings behave like any other sociolinguistic variable, and familiar
patterns are observed, including those related to change from above and the
hypercorrect pattern of the second-highest status group (here, Bonaire
speakers). Thomason and Kaufman's position is not supported at the
systemic level in terms of what is borrowed and what is not, but it is
supported in terms of factors governing the use of borrowed
forms—social/demographic factors relating to language contact are stronger
than linguistic constraints.
This study is one of the first to use quantitative methods to evaluate
principles of structural borrowing. The findings contribute to our
understanding of the long-term consequences of language contact.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
