* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 16.1957

Fri Jun 24 2005

Sum: Negation Systems

Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton <jessicalinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Claire Lampp, Negation Systems

Message 1: Negation Systems
Date: 24-Jun-2005
From: Claire Lampp <lamppemail.unc.edu>
Subject: Negation Systems

Regarding query: http://linguistlist.org/issues/16/16-1627.html#1

Thank you to the following individuals, who made me aware of negation
systems in various languages and directed me to appropriate reference
works: Aubrey Nunes, Timur Maisak, Hedde Zeiljstra, Elena Bashir, and B.C.
Singh. Should anyone like to share additional thoughts, that would be
appreciated as well.

Aubrey Nunes referred me to the French system, with its several negative

Timur Maisak pointed out that many of the Caucasian languages have "split"
negation systems and provided the following as examples: the
Nakh-Daghestanian family, which is usually split along
prohibitive/non-prohibitive lines; Udi, which has one negator corresponding
to the indicative, another corresponding to the prohibitive, and a third
used with non-finite forms; Georgian, which uses three negation markers
roughly assigned to "prohibitive," "possibilitive," and default.

Timur also directed me to several reference works:
- An online grammar of Udi by Wolfgang Schulze at
- A collection on the Caucasian languages in Lingua 115 (2005), esp. pp.
65, 169-170.
- The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus (in four volumes edited by
Greppin, Harris, and Smeets; 1994)
- for a typology of prohibitive marking: the introduction to Xrakovskij
(ed.). Typology of Imperative Constructions. Muenchen, 2001.
- as an example for the use of honorific vs. non-honorific in the
prohibitive: Louwerse, J. The Morphosyntax of Una in Relation to
Discourse Structure: A Descriptive Analysis (Pacific Linguistics, Series B,
100). Canberra: Australian National University, 1988. pp. 21-22.
- on Georgian: Vogt, H. Grammaire de la langue georgienne. (Instituttet
for sammenlignende kulturforskning; Series B: Skrifter, 57). Oslo:
Universitetsforlaget, 1971. p. 197-198.

Hedde Zeiljstra distinguished two language types based on negation systems.
In one, "two negative markers have distinct semantic/pragmatic functions."
For this type, he gave the example of Bengali and referred me to a paper
by Gillian Ramchand ("Tense and negation in Bengali" in Linguistic
Structure and Language Dynamics in South Asia, 2001, pp. 308-326). For the
second type, Hedde referred to French and highlighted "Jesperson's Cycle."
In such languages, "the difference between the two markers is mainly
syntactic." Hedde also directed me to particular sections of his thesis,
"Sentential Negation and Negative Concord," for further study.

Elena Bashir referred me to a relevant paper she presented at the 23rd
annual meeting of the South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable (SALA 23)
entitled "Na and nahII in Hindi and Urdu."

B. C. Singh shared information on verbal negation in Oriya, in which the
negative morpheme can be an auxiliary, a particle, or a suffix. Further,
in Oriya some negative markers are morphological and some are syntactic.

Thank you all for your contributions!

Claire Lampp

Linguistic Field(s): Genetic Classification
Historical Linguistics

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.