LINGUIST List 16.2208
|
Tue Jul 19 2005
Qs: Profglot Code; Discussion List for Journal Editors
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
<jessica linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Simon
Courtenage,
Profglot Code
2. Robert
Dale,
Discussion List for Journal Editors
Message 1: Profglot Code
|
Date: 18-Jul-2005
From: Simon Courtenage <courtes westminster.ac.uk>
Subject: Profglot Code
I would like to find out if anyone has the code for Profglot that they could send me (email address: courtes wmin.ac.uk). Many thanks Simon Courtenage -- Dr. Simon Courtenage Software Systems Engineering Research Group Dept. of Software Engineering Cavendish School of Computer Science University of Westminster, London, UK Email: courtes wmin.ac.uk Web: http://users.cscs.wmin.ac.uk/~courtes/ | http://www.sse.wmin.ac.uk Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
Message 2: Discussion List for Journal Editors
|
Date: 18-Jul-2005
From: Robert Dale <rdale ics.mq.edu.au>
Subject: Discussion List for Journal Editors
As editor of Computational Linguistics, I've often felt that it would be useful to discuss issues and share knowledge with other journal editors. I've been wondering if there's a discussion list out there for journal editors; I've done a fair bit of googling in an attempt to find something, but with no success. Then it occurred to me that it's probably the case that the editors of most journals in the linguistics space read Linguist. So: does anyone on the list know of such a discussion list? And if not, if you're the editor of a journal, would you be interested in being on such a list? If there's sufficient interest I'll set one up. This may be the kind of thing where a more or less discipline-specific model is the way to go: there might be much to be gained from the editors of all the journals of interest to a community (like the Linguist community) having a common forum. Any responses will be gratefully received, and if it looks like there is anything there of general interest to the Linguist readership I'll post an appropriate summary. R Linguistic Field(s): Not Applicable
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|