LINGUIST List 16.2215
|
Wed Jul 20 2005
Qs: Desiderata for a Database; Most Conservative Lang
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
<jessica linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Christina
Jacovides,
Desiderata for a Linguistic Database
2. Pete
Unseth,
Most Conservative Language
Message 1: Desiderata for a Linguistic Database
|
Date: 20-Jul-2005
From: Christina Jacovides <czljacovides yahoo.com>
Subject: Desiderata for a Linguistic Database
The Computer Science Department at Wayne State University is working with LINGUIST to create a linguistic database that would combine several web-based language resources (sites containing language documentation in the form of corpora, annotated texts, audio/visual information, etc.) into a single, searchable, and browsable database. The hope is to organize the data in such a way that the database can return intelligent results to a wide range of queries. In order to make this database useful to linguists, though, the computer scientists designing the database need to have a sense of what linguists might require from such a database - what kinds of queries would they be making, what types of questions are important? They are interested in coming up with a broad list of sample questions. The list should include questions that are similar to, but slightly more general than, those published in the queries pages of the LINGUIST website. I would be very grateful if you could take a few minutes to share any suggestions you may have for possible questions, any websites you know of that might be useful, any ideas you have that might help non-linguists understand a little more about what exactly linguists are looking for in their research and in language documentation. Thanks very much, Christina Jacovides WSU (Technician) Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
Message 2: Most Conservative Language
|
Date: 19-Jul-2005
From: Pete Unseth <Pete_Unseth gial.edu>
Subject: Most Conservative Language
A reporter recently asked me, "Which of today's languages is most like its ancestor?" What he wanted to know is: speakers of which of today's languages would be able to go back in time the farthest and be able to communicate verbally? I suspect it is a language with a written heritage. Any speculation would be welcome. If the replies warrant it, I will post a summary. Pete Unseth Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|