* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 16.2338

Sat Aug 06 2005

Qs: Lists of American vs. British Pronunciations

Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton <jessicalinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Marie Meteer, Lists of American vs. British Pronunciations


Message 1: Lists of American vs. British Pronunciations
Date: 04-Aug-2005
From: Marie Meteer <mmeteerbbn.com>
Subject: Lists of American vs. British Pronunciations


Does anyone know where to find a list of the words that are systematically
pronounced differently in british and American English (e.g. issue,
laboratory, process). Idealy we would like a lexicon with pronunciations
that can be used commercially.

Many thanks,
Marie Meteer
mmeteerbbn.com
www.bbn.com/avoke

Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
                            Lexicography
                            Phonology

Subject Language(s): English (ENG)



Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.