LINGUIST List 16.2361
|
Wed Aug 10 2005
Books: Morphology: Dressler et al (Eds)
Editor for this issue: Megan Zdrojkowski
<megan linguistlist.org>
|
Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
|
Directory
1. Paul
Peranteau,
Morphology and its Demarcations: Dressler et al (Eds)
Message 1: Morphology and its Demarcations: Dressler et al (Eds)
|
Date: 05-Aug-2005
From: Paul Peranteau <paul benjamins.com>
Subject: Morphology and its Demarcations: Dressler et al (Eds)
Title: Morphology and its Demarcations Subtitle: Selected Papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004 Series Title: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264 Publication Year: 2005 Publisher: John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/ Book URL: http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_bookview.cgi?bookid=CILT%20264 Editor: Wolfgang U. Dressler, Editor: Dieter Kastovsky, Universität Wien Editor: Oskar E. Pfeiffer Editor: Franz Rainer, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Hardback: ISBN: 1588116387 Pages: xiv, 317 Price: U.S. $ 150.00 Hardback: ISBN: 9027247781 Pages: xiv, 317 Price: Europe EURO 125.00 Abstract: The papers in this volume derive from the International Morphology Meeting (Vienna 2004) and were selected because they address the main topic of the conference: external and internal demarcations of morphology. The external demarcation between syntax and morphology is dealt with in the papers by Rood, Cysouw, Milićević, Blom, Enrique-Arias, and Heine & König. Demarcations of inflection and derivation are discussed in the contributions by Ricca, Lloret, Manova, Say, Žaucer, and Stump. In contrast to theoretical discussions in previous literature, which have concentrated on the internal boundary between inflection and derivation, this volume attributes equal importance to the demarcations between derivation and compounding, addressed in the contributions by Bauer, Booij, Štekauer, Fradin, Amiot, and Saclise, Bisetto & Guevara. Table of contents Wichita Word Formation: Syntactic Morphology David S. Rood Morphology in the Wrong Place: A Survey of Preposed Enclitics Michael Cysouw Clitics or Affixes? On the Morphological Status of the Future-Tense Markers in Serbian Jasmina Milićević The Demarcation of Morphology and Syntax: A Diachronic Perspective on Particle Verbs Corrien Blom When Clitics Become Affixes, Where do they Come to Rest? A Case from Spanish Andrés Enrique-Arias Grammatical Hybrids: Between Serialization, Compounding and Derivation in !Xun (North Khoisan) Bernd Heine and Christa König The Borderline between Derivation and Compounding Laurie Bauer Compounding and Derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology Geert E. Booij Selection in Compounding and Derivation Sergio Scalise, Antonietta Bisetto and Emiliano Guevara Compounding and Affixation: Any Difference? Pavol Štekauer On a Semantically Grounded Difference between Derivation and Compounding Bernard Fradin Between Compounding and Derivation: Elements of Word Formation Corresponding to Prepositions Dany Amiot Cumulative Exponence Involving Derivation: Some Patterns for an Uncommon Phenomenon Davide Ricca Revising the Phonological Motivation for Splitting the Morphology Maria-Rosa Lloret Derivation versus Inflection in three Inflecting Languages Stela Manova Antipassive Sja-Verbs in Russian: Between Inflection and Derivation Sergey Say Slavic Prefixes as State Morphemes: From State to Change-of-state and Perfectivity Rok Žaucer Delineating the Boundary between Inflection-class Marking and Derivational Marking: The Case of Sanskrit -aya Gregory T. Stump Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories Morphology Syntax Subject Language(s): Kung-ekoka (KNW) Russian (RUS) Sanskrit (SKT) Spanish (SPN) Serbo-croatian (SRC) Wichita (WIC) Written In: English (ENG) See this book announcement on our website: http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=15879
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|