LINGUIST List 16.2595|
Fri Sep 09 2005
Qs: Subjects of (Non)-inflected Verbs; Cocoliche
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Subjects of Non-inflected and Inflected Verbs
Message 1: Subjects of Non-inflected and Inflected Verbs
From: Rocío Pérez-Tattam <rospthotmail.com>
Subject: Subjects of Non-inflected and Inflected Verbs
I am a doctoral student. I am investigating the possible relationship
between the empty subjects of non-inflected and inflected verbs in English
I am looking for any bibliographical references of new analyses of PRO from
a Minimalist perspective (I am familiar with Hornstein's and Landau's
analyses of control), and I am specially interested in ascertaining whether
PRO has been related to any parameter.
Thank you very much in advance.
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
Message 2: Cocoliche
From: Giuliana Fiorentino <fiorentiuniroma3.it>
There is a student of mine interested in a decsription of the cocoliche
pidgin. We are serching for some references and, possibly, a corpus of data.
Linguistic Field(s): Sociolinguistics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue