LINGUIST List 16.2994
|
Sun Oct 16 2005
Confs: Discourse Analysis/Braga, Portugal
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
<kevin linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Isabel
Ermida,
3rd International Conference on Linguistic Discourse Analysis
Message 1: 3rd International Conference on Linguistic Discourse Analysis
|
Date: 11-Oct-2005
From: Isabel Ermida <iermida ilch.uminho.pt>
Subject: 3rd International Conference on Linguistic Discourse Analysis
3rd International Conference on Linguistic Discourse Analysis
Date: 10-Nov-2005 - 11-Nov-2005
Location: Braga, Portugal
Contact: Isabel Ermida
Contact Email: < click here to access email >
Meeting URL: http://www2.ilch.uminho.pt/ALD/index1.htm
Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
Meeting Description:
The 3rd International Conference of Linguistic Discourse Analysis University of Minho Braga, Portugal 10-11 November, 2005.
The 3rd International Conference of Linguistic Discourse Analysis will be held at the University of Minho, in Braga, Portugal, on 10-11 November, 2005. As a follow-up to previous meetings, this conference sets out to reflect upon the broad area of Linguistic Discourse Analysis (LDA), with a special emphasis on the topic of modalization. Being a central concern in today's LDA, modalization constitutes a complex and polemic theme, in terms not only of definition, but also of the areas it covers and the questions it raises. This conference, whose subtitle is ''Discursive Processes of Modalization'', seeks therefore to provide a profitable place for debate and discussion within the specific domain of modalization. Despite this emphasis, it also welcomes papers on other topics within LDA.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|