LINGUIST List 16.3118|
Fri Oct 28 2005
Confs: Computational Ling/Semantics/Venice, Italy
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
The 2nd PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge Workshop
Message 1: The 2nd PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge Workshop
From: Roy Bar-Haim <barhaircs.biu.ac.il>
Subject: The 2nd PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge Workshop
The 2nd PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge Workshop
Short Title: PASCAL RTE-2 Workshop
Date: 10-Apr-2006 - 10-Apr-2006
Location: Venice, Italy
Contact: Roy Bar-Haim
Contact Email: < click here to access email >
Meeting URL: http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE2
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics; Semantics; Text/Corpus Linguistics
Textual Entailment Recognition was proposed recently as a generic task that captures major semantic inference needs across many natural language processing applications. This task requires to recognise, given two text fragments, whether the meaning of one text is entailed (can be inferred) from the other text. The first PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge provided the first benchmark for the entailment task. The challenge raised noticeable attention in the research community, attracting 17 submissions from research groups worldwide. By introducing a second challenge we hope to keep the momentum going, and to further promote the formation of a research community around the applied entailment task. One of the main goals for the RTE-2 dataset is to provide more 'realistic' text-hypothesis examples, based mostly on outputs of actual systems.
The Second PASCAL
Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
Call for Participation
A fundamental phenomenon of natural language is the variability of semantic expression, where the same meaning can be expressed by or inferred from different texts. Many natural language processing applications, such as Question Answering (QA), Information Retrieval (IR), Information Extraction (IE), and (multi) document summarization need to model this variability in order to recognize that a particular target meaning can be inferred from different text variants. Even though many applications face similar underlying semantic problems, these problems are usually addressed in an application-oriented manner.
Textual Entailment Recognition was proposed recently as a generic task and evaluation framework that captures major semantic inference needs across natural language processing applications. The current challenge considers an applied notion of textual entailment, defined as a directional relation between two text fragments, termed T - the entailing text, and H - the entailed text. We say that T entails H if, typically, a human reading T would infer that H is most likely true (see examples below). This operational definition is based on (and assumes) common human understanding of language as well as common background knowledge.
The last two years have seen rapidly growing interest in textual entailment within the natural language processing community. The First PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment (RTE) Challenge provided the first benchmark for evaluating entailment systems. The challenge raised noticeable attention in the research community, attracting 17 submissions from diverse groups. The relatively low accuracy achieved by the participating systems suggests that the entailment task is indeed a challenging one, with a wide room for improvement. It was followed by an ACL 2005 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment. The challenge and its dataset motivated further research on empirical entailment, which resulted in a number of publications in recent main conferences as well as the inclusion of this topic in some recent calls for papers.
By introducing a second challenge we hope to keep the momentum going, and to further promote the formation of a research community around the applied entailment task. As in the previous challenge, the main task is judging whether a hypothesis (H) is entailed by a text (T). One of the main goals for the RTE-2 dataset is to provide more ''realistic'' text-hypothesis examples, based mostly on outputs of actual systems. We focus on the four application settings mentioned above: QA, IR, IE and multi-document summarization. Each portion of the dataset includes typical T-H examples that correspond to success and failure cases of such applications. The examples represent different levels of entailment reasoning, such as lexical, syntactic, morphological and logical. The data collection procedure for each application setting can be found in the challenge website. The development subset, which represents the different types of test examples, is released first, but systems are likely to use external and unsupervised knowledge resources as well. The development set consists of 800 examples, 200 for each application setting. The test set will contain 1000-1200 examples. To make the challenge data more accessible, we also provide some pre-processing for the text and hypothesis, including sentence splitting and dependency parsing.
RTE-2 was organized by Bar-Ilan University (Israel), CELCT (Trento, Italy), Microsoft Research (USA) and MITRE (USA). Data collection and annotation processes were improved this year, including cross-annotation of the examples across the organizing sites.
Text: The drugs that slow down or halt Alzheimer's disease work best the earlier you administer them.
Hypothesis: Alzheimer's disease is treated using drugs.
Text: Drew Walker, NHS Tayside's public health director, said: ''It is important to stress that this is not a confirmed case of rabies.''
Hypothesis: A case of rabies was confirmed.
Text: Yoko Ono unveiled a bronze statue of her late husband, John Lennon, to complete the official renaming of England's Liverpool Airport as Liverpool John Lennon Airport.
Hypothesis: Yoko Ono is John Lennon's widow.
Text: Arabic, for example, is used densely across North Africa and from the Eastern Mediterranean to the Philippines, as the key language of the Arab world and the primary vehicle of Islam.
Hypothesis: Arabic is the primary language of the Philippines.
Release of Development Set October 26, 2005
Release of Test Set January 12, 2006
Deadline for participants' Submissions February 2, 2006
Release of individual results February 7, 2006
Deadline for participants' reports February 21, 2006
Camera-ready version of reports March 14, 2006
PASCAL Challenges Workshop April 10, 2006
(in Venice, Italy)
Note: the workshop is scheduled right after EACL.
Bar-Ilan University, Israel (Coordinator):
CELCT, Trento - Italy:
Microsoft Research, USA:
The preparation and running of this challenge has been supported by the
EU-funded PASCAL Network of Excellence on Pattern Analysis, Statistical
Modelling and Computational Learning.
For registration, further information and inquiries - please visit
the challenge web site:
Contact: Roy Bar-Haim cs.biu.ac.il>
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.