* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 16.3149

Tue Nov 01 2005

Diss: Discourse Analysis/Text/Corpus Ling: Monacelli: 'S

Editor for this issue: Meredith Valant <meredithlinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Claudia Monacelli, Surviving the Role: A corpus-based study of self-regulation in simultaneous interpreting as perceived through participation framework and interactional politeness


Message 1: Surviving the Role: A corpus-based study of self-regulation in simultaneous interpreting as perceived through participation framework and interactional politeness
Date: 30-Oct-2005
From: Claudia Monacelli <claudia.monacelliluspio.it>
Subject: Surviving the Role: A corpus-based study of self-regulation in simultaneous interpreting as perceived through participation framework and interactional politeness


Institution: Heriot Watt University
Program: Department of Languages and Intercultural Studies
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2005

Author: Claudia Monacelli

Dissertation Title: Surviving the Role: A corpus-based study of self-regulation in simultaneous interpreting as perceived through participation framework and interactional politeness

Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
                            Text/Corpus Linguistics

Dissertation Director:
Ian Mason

Dissertation Abstract:

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of self-regulation on
the behaviour of simultaneous interpreters via a study of participation
framework and interactional politeness and to establish some explanatory
and predictive principles. Following work on self-regulation in other
fields (Bandura 1997), autopoiesis (Maturana and and Varela 1998),
sociolinguistic studies concerned with contextual matters and participation
framework (Duranti and Goodwin 1992; Goffman 1981), interactional
linguistic politeness (Brown and Levinson 1987) and interpreting studies
(Diriker 2004), this study takes as its starting point the assumption that
self-regulation is a viable construct with which to analyse simultaneous
interpreting since this working mode is inherently face-threatening.
Simultaneous interpreting is characterized by systemic and interpersonal
constraints that affect the interpreter's role, thus warranting
self-regulatory moves to ensure professional survival. We analyse
self-regulation in a corpus of authentic situated texts and identify trends
in self-regulatory behaviour across all corpus texts. Analysis is based on
a research design consisting of four parts: collection of data, briefing
with subjects, textual analysis, debriefing with subjects. We examine
personal reference, agency, modality and interactional linguistic
politeness and include both a quantitative and qualitative component. A
quantitative assessment is primarily concerned with the number of
occurrences and the nature of non-obligatory translational shifts. A
qualitative analysis consists of collecting personal data on our subjects,
analysing shifts using a contextual model designed specifically for the
purposes of this study and retrospective studies. The study concludes that
the nature of self-regulatory behaviour in the corpus is one of distancing,
de-personalisation and the mitigation of illocutionary force. This involves
subjects in a position of detachment with respect to both the source text
and their own text. A further important finding is the uniformity of this
trend, which manifests itself in all interpreted versions of corpus texts.





Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.