LINGUIST List 16.3338
|
Sun Nov 20 2005
Diss: Computational Linguistics: Shan: 'Linguistic S...'
Editor for this issue: Meredith Valant
<meredith linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Chung-chieh
Shan,
Linguistic Side Effects
Message 1: Linguistic Side Effects
|
Date: 18-Nov-2005
From: Chung-chieh Shan <ccshan rutgers.edu>
Subject: Linguistic Side Effects
Institution: Harvard University
Program: Computer Science, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2005
Author: Chung-chieh Shan
Dissertation Title: Linguistic Side Effects
Dissertation URL: http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~ccshan/dissertation/book.pdf
Linguistic Field(s):
Computational Linguistics
Dissertation Director:
Stuart M. Shieber
Dissertation Abstract:
Apparently noncompositional phenomena in natural languages can be analyzed like computational side effects in programming languages: anaphora can be analyzed like state, intensionality can be analyzed like environment, quantification can be analyzed like delimited control, and so on. We thus term apparently noncompositional phenomena in natural languages 'linguistic side effects'. We put this new, general analogy to work in linguistics as well as programming-language theory. In linguistics, we turn the continuation semantics for delimited control into a new implementation of quantification in type-logical grammar. This graphically-motivated implementation does not move nearby constituents apart or distant constituents together. Just as delimited control encodes many computational side effects, quantification encodes many linguistic side effects, in particular anaphora, interrogation, and polarity sensitivity. Using the programming-language concepts of evaluation order and multistage programming, we unify four linguistic phenomena that had been dealt with only separately before: linear scope in quantification, crossover in anaphora, superiority in interrogation, and linear order in polarity sensitivity. This unified account is the first to predict a complex pattern of interaction between anaphora and raised-wh questions, without any stipulation on both. It also provides the first concrete processing explanation of linear order in polarity sensitivity. In programming-language theory, we transfer a duality between expressions and contexts from our analysis of quantification to a new programming language with delimited control. This duality exchanges call-by-value evaluation with call-by-name evaluation, thus extending a known duality from undelimited to delimited control. The same duality also exchanges the familiar 'let' construct with the less-familiar 'shift' construct, so that the latter can be understood in terms of the former.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|