LINGUIST List 16.585

Sun Feb 27 2005

Qs: Lomongo Speakers; Ergativity and Thematic Roles

Editor for this issue: Steven Moran <stevelinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

        1.    Nikki Adams, Lomongo Speakers
        2.    Vita Markman, Ergativity and Thematic Roles


Message 1: Lomongo Speakers

Date: 24-Feb-2005
From: Nikki Adams <nadamsuchicago.edu>
Subject: Lomongo Speakers


Hello,

I am searching for speakers of a particular language. I'm looking at
Lomongo, and it is difficult to find speakers.

Thanks,

Nikki

Linguistic Field(s): Language Description

Subject Language(s): Mongo-nkundu (MOM)

Message 2: Ergativity and Thematic Roles

Date: 25-Feb-2005
From: Vita Markman <markmaneden.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Ergativity and Thematic Roles


Dear all,

i was wondering if anyone knows any references on the following question:

in ergative (split-ergative ) languages, is the range of theta-roles
assigned to the ergative subject limited at all semantically such that it
must be agentive or could it also be an experiencer? For example, in
english, sentences such as:
(1) and (2) may arguably involve different theta -roles for the subject
(e.g. experiencer vs. agent). Can an ergative subject in (any?/ some?/all?)
ergative languages also be used in a sentence such as (1) where it is
non-agentive.

(1) John likes Mary

(2) John hit Mary

i would greatly appreciate any references/ pointers on this issue.

thank you very much,
-vita markman.

Linguistic Field(s): Syntax

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue