* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 17.1099

Tue Apr 11 2006

Books: Discourse Analysis: Phillips, Rhees (Eds)

Editor for this issue: Maria Moreno-Rollins <marialinguistlist.org>


Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Directory
        1.    Matt Glidden, Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse: Phillips, Rhees (Eds)


Message 1: Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse: Phillips, Rhees (Eds)
Date: 11-Apr-2006
From: Matt Glidden <blackwellnewsbos.blackwellpublishing.net>
Subject: Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse: Phillips, Rhees (Eds)


Title: Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse
Published: 2006
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
                http://www.blackwellpublishing.com

Editor: D.Z. Phillips
Editor: Rush Rhees
Paperback: ISBN: 1405132507 Pages: 352 Price: U.K. £ 19.99
Paperback: ISBN: 1405132507 Pages: 352 Price: U.S. $ 34.95
Paperback: ISBN: 1405132507 Pages: 352 Price: AUS $ 76.95
Abstract:

This original critique of Wittgenstein's analogy between language and
games, written by one of the philosopher's literary executors and closest
friends, has now been updated to include two additional articles.
Updated edition of this original critique of Wittgenstein's analogy between
language and games.
Rush Rhees was one of Wittgenstein's literary executors and closest
friends, as well as being an outstanding philosopher in his own right.
D.Z. Phillips is Director of the Rush Rhees Archive and the Associated
Centre for Wittgensteinian Studies.
Constitutes a major contribution to Wittgenstein scholarship and to
philosophical debates about the possibility of discourse.
The second edition includes as a preface Rhees' article, 'The Fundamental
Problems of Philosophy', first published in 1994. It also includes as a
second appendix some of Rhees' reflections of Wittgenstein, his teacher.

Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis

Written In: English (eng )

See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=19077


-------------------------- Major Supporters --------------------------
Blackwell Publishing http://www.blackwellpublishing.com
Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.org
Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
European Language Resources Association http://www.elda.org/sommaire.php
Georgetown University Press http://www.press.georgetown.edu
Hodder Arnold http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates http://www.erlbaum.com/
Lincom GmbH http://www.lincom.at
MIT Press http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Mouton de Gruyter http://www.mouton-publishers.com
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com
Rodopi http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/
Springer http://www.springeronline.com

---------------------- Other Supporting Publishers ----------------------
Anthropological Linguistics http://www.indiana.edu/~anthling/
CSLI Publications http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/
Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc. Umass http://glsa.hypermart.net/
International Pragmatics Assoc. http://ipra-www.uia.ac.be/ipra/
Kingston Press Ltd http://www.kingstonpress.com/
Linguistic Assoc. of Finland http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Pacific Linguistics http://pacling.anu.edu.au/
SIL International http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd. http://www.stjerome.co.uk
Utrecht institute of Linguistics http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/

 





This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $52,932. This money will go to help keep the 
List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 2006 
LINGUIST List Cruise for some Fund Drive fun!

http://linguistlist.org/cruise.html 

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form.

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later.

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to donate by 
check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:

http://linguistlist.org/donate.html

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such can 
receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non Profit 
organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be offset against 
your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers only). For more 
information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any gift 
you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting your human 
resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills in and returns 
to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure that doubles the 
value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment 
to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.