LINGUIST List 17.1188
|
Thu Apr 20 2006
Qs: Individuality of Novel Usage of Present Perfect
Editor for this issue: James Rider
<rider linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Tomas
Van Stappen,
Individuality of Novel Usage of Present Perfect
Message 1: Individuality of Novel Usage of Present Perfect
|
Date: 19-Apr-2006
From: Tomas Van Stappen <tvstappe vub.ac.be>
Subject: Individuality of Novel Usage of Present Perfect
To whom it may concern, For my dissertation project at the Free University of Brussels I have chosen a corpus-based study of the forms, functions and distribution of the Preterite and Present Perfect in American and British English. I am especially interested in novel uses of the Present Perfect such as ''I have seen him yesterday''. According to Gachelin this novel usage ''can even occassionally be already seen at work inside marginal trends of Standard English''. This novel use is thought of as particularly British and contrasts with the traditional view that the present perfect cannot combine with past time adverbials. It is my guess that this novel use will occur significantly more if a first person singular pronoun is the subject of a situation that is described by a present perfect in combination with a past time adverbial. At some subconscious level, a shift in perspective like this (reference time being moved from overlapping with the moment of speaking to a time-span situated entirely before that moment) is too personal and unorthodox for the speaker to be imposed upon a hearer or some third party. At least, that is one of my hypotheses. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything in the literature on the grammaticization of the present perfect to a past tense that supports or relates to this hypothesis. Therefore, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I am also interested in articles relating to the degree of individuality that is involved in grammaticization of the present perfect (or grammaticization in general), that is in articles that deal with the role of the individual language user in the process of grammaticization. Yours sincerely, Tomas Van Stappen 3rd year Germanic Languages Free University of Brussels REFERENCES: Gachelin, Jean-Marc. 1990. Aspect in non-standard English, in J.L. Duchet (ed). ''L' auxiliare en question'', Travaux Linguistiques du C.E.R.L.C.O. 2, 1990.
Linguistic Field(s):
Psycholinguistics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|