LINGUIST List 17.1246
|
Tue Apr 25 2006
Qs: Orthography Research Questionnaire
Editor for this issue: James Rider
<rider linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Christopher
Moseley,
Orthography Research Questionnaire
Message 1: Orthography Research Questionnaire
|
Date: 23-Apr-2006
From: Christopher Moseley <chrismoseley50 yahoo.com>
Subject: Orthography Research Questionnaire
I am currently embarking on a Ph.D. thesis in linguistics at University College, London. My subject is ''Alphabet Adaptation'' - the adaptation of the Roman and Cyrillic alphabets to established written languages in the past, and the creation of orthographies for previously unwritten languages in the present. I'm keen to make contact with field-workers and linguists who have experience of, or are currently working on, devising such orthographies (even if they are not Roman-based). I have devised a detailed questionnaire on the problems and considerations involved in orthography creation, and I would like to send it to any linguist who would like to participate. All responses will be gratefully acknowledged, of course.
Linguistic Field(s):
Writing Systems
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|