LINGUIST List 17.1480
|
Sun May 14 2006
Calls: Computational Ling/Germany;General Ling/USA
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
<kevin linguistlist.org>
|
As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in the text. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Antonietta
Alonge,
Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches: What Can We Gain by Computational Treatment of Data?
2. Alvaro
Baquero-Pecino,
Georgetown Graduate Portuguese and Spanish Symposium
Message 1: Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches: What Can We Gain by Computational Treatment of Data?
|
Date: 10-May-2006
From: Antonietta Alonge <anto.alonge unipg.it>
Subject: Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches: What Can We Gain by Computational Treatment of Data?
Full Title: Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches: What Can We Gain by Computational Treatment of Data? Date: 05-Oct-2006 - 07-Oct-2006 Location: Munich, Germany Contact Person: Antonietta Alonge Meeting Email: anto.alonge unipg.it Web Site: https://gushare.georgetown.edu/solerp/GRAPHSY2006/Index.html Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Computational Linguistics Call Deadline: 31-May-2006 SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS Cognitive-linguistic approaches: what can we gain by computational treatment of data? A theme session at DGKL-06 (Meeting of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association), Munich, Germany, 5-7 October 2006 http://webapp.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/~DGKL/gcla_2006.shtml http://www.kognitive-sprachforschung.lmu.de/ !!! NEW DEADLINE EXTENSION for abstract submission: 31st May 2006 !!! Work with empirical data is important, if not essential, to cognitive linguistics. Electronic corpora of written texts or transcriptions of speech are increasingly used and sometimes purposefully collected by linguists in their investigations of phenomena such as metaphor, metonymy, idioms, and frames. During their work, some linguists also compile - more or less private - electronic archives of phenomena studied in cognitive linguistics: searchable lists, classifications, databases. Moreover, they have to deal with these phenomena - usually in cooperation with computational linguists and computer scientists - when building general lexicon resources for the automatic treatment of language. Problems that arise when working with corpora are connected to the way they are prepared for and processed by the corpus tools (concordancers, corpus managers). For example, in spite of some attempts in computational linguistics to detect metaphors in running texts, no corpus manager disposes of a ''Show all metaphors'' function. Rather, in order to search a corpus for metaphors, linguists will devise their own methods, be they theory-based or data-driven. Other problems arise when creating project-specific as well as more general archives of language usage examples classified by cognitive linguistic criteria. Here, linguists decide which criteria they use in their classifications and which features of the archived data they annotate. These decisions are often made at a project-specific basis and therefore different classifications might be difficult to compare. At a larger scale, this also applies to general linguistic resources developed for Human Language Technology applications. The decisions taken during linguistic resource-building may then be evaluated - by the resource developers or others -, based on large quantities of data encoded in the resources themselves. Evaluations of this kind are at the same time test-beds for theories put forth in cognitive linguistics, and their results provide valuable feedback for theory development. In this theme session, we would like to discuss methods of exploiting electronic corpora for any cognitive linguistic research, not restricted to the phenomena mentioned above, as well as practical experiences with resource building in cognitive linguistics. We also invite contributions that evaluate the implications of data encoded in computational resources, from the viewpoint of cognitive linguistic theory. Please send only detailed abstracts (2 pages), in which you make clear how your study is related to the topics indicated. The deadline for abstract submission is 31st May 2006. Participants will be notified of the acceptance of their papers by 1st July 2006. Please send your abstracts exclusively as email attachments (pdf- or rtf-files) to: Antonietta Alonge (Perugia) anto.alonge unipg.it Birte Lönneker-Rodman (Hamburg) birte.loenneker uni-hamburg.de
Message 2: Georgetown Graduate Portuguese and Spanish Symposium
|
Date: 10-May-2006
From: Alvaro Baquero-Pecino <GRAPHSY2006 gmail.com>
Subject: Georgetown Graduate Portuguese and Spanish Symposium
Full Title: Georgetown Graduate Portuguese and Spanish Symposium Short Title: GRAPHSY Date: 29-Sep-2006 - 30-Sep-2006 Location: Washington DC, USA Contact Person: Alvaro Baquero-Pecino Meeting Email: GRAPHSY2006 gmail.com Web Site: http://www8.georgetown.edu/departments/spanport/Graphsy/ Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics Subject Language(s): Spanish (spa) Call Deadline: 01-Jul-2006 Meeting Description: LANGUAGES OF (EX)CHANGE: A Symposium of Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian Literature, Linguistics, and Visual Culture The Georgetown University graduate students in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese invite all interested graduate students to the second annual Graduate Portuguese and Hispanic Symposium (GRAPHSY), which will be held on Friday, September 29 and Saturday, September 30 , 2006. The organizing committee will consider papers related to Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian Literature, Linguistics, and Cultural Studies, as well as requests for the formation of special sessions organized around a specific topic, author or work. These sessions are limited to three papers. Papers may examine the conference topic from a variety of perspectives, including linguistic, social, psychological, cultural, theoretical, political, ideological, and/or artistic. Possible panel topics and papers might include, but are not limited to: Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian Literature and Cultural Studies - Trans-Atlantic voyages, pilgrimages, and shipwrecks National and post-national utopias(Mis)representations in performance and visual culture North/ South Dialogues: US Latino Studies Intertextuality and tales of exchange Migrations, exile, and new frontiers and spaces With(in) and beyond the body: gender identities and politics Ethnographic writing Representations of violence Politics of the memory: trauma and turmoil Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian Linguistics - Language(s) of exclusion: social hierarchies and languages Innovative research methodologies in second language acquisition (SLA ) Language learning context Language acquisition (first, second, and subsequent) Language and cognition Language contact: Bilingualism in Latin America, the Peninsula , and the US Code-switching and division of private and public spheres Language policies, practices, and political systems Endangered languages: Interaction with the dominant faction Language revival Theoretical Approaches in Linguistics (Syntax, Phonology, Semantics, Pragmatics) Please submit by July 1st, 2006 two separate 250-word abstracts in Portuguese, English or Spanish. We only accept electronic submissions to GRAPHSY2006 gmail.com -- On one abstract, please include the title of proposed paper, name, academic affiliation, current address, telephone, and e-mail address of each presenter. -- The second abstract should be anonymous. The paper presentation is limited to 20 minutes (8-10 double-spaced pages). Registration: General registration fee for all presenters is $40 (late or on-site official attendance registration is $50). This fee includes the cost of all food and beverages provided only to conference participants. The keynote speaker(s) will be announced shortly.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|