LINGUIST List 17.1659
|
Thu Jun 01 2006
Qs: Formulaic Sequences
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
<jessica linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Joanna
Jendryczka,
Formulaic Sequences
Message 1: Formulaic Sequences
|
Date: 30-May-2006
From: Joanna Jendryczka <joanna.jendryczka gmail.com>
Subject: Formulaic Sequences
Dear list members, As a part of my M.A. thesis, I am investigating multi-word units (otherways called recurrent sequences, word bundles, etc.) in non-native English speech. I remember having read somewhere that if such a string of words contains repeats (of the same words) and/or hesitation (like erm, mm, uhu) within it, it cannot be treated as a formula, for the very inclusion of repetition or hesitation proves the sequence was not processed as a whole but rather as a set of words. Unfortunately, I do not remember from which scolar the idea comes and I need it for justification of my very study. I'll appreciate any hints or direct reference to the source. Best regards, Joanna Jendryczka ------------------ ------------------ M.A. English Linguistics student A.Mickiewicz University Poznan, Poland
Linguistic Field(s):
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|