LINGUIST List 17.1733
|
Wed Jun 07 2006
Qs: Counterfactual 'Liketa'; Calculating Language Ages
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
<jessica linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Mike
Putnam,
Counterfactual 'Liketa'
2. Nick
Riches,
Calculating Language Ages from Clinical Examination of Language Fundamentals Subtests
Message 1: Counterfactual 'Liketa'
|
Date: 07-Jun-2006
From: Mike Putnam <mtputnam umich.edu>
Subject: Counterfactual 'Liketa'
For the past two months I've been working on a paper addressing generative aspects of the counterfactual ''liketa'' construction in Appalachian English: (1) It was so cold, I liketa froze/*freeze. 'It was cold, I could have/almost froze (to death)' (2) You were so cold, you liketa froze/*freeze. 'You were so cold, you could have/almost froze (to death)' The ''liketa'' construction does not inflect for either tense or person, however, it's difficult to treat this fully like a modal due to the fact it takes a participial complement. (Perhaps it is possible to consider ''liketa'' a catenative that is a quasi-modal that takes a participle complement (i.e. ''get trapped''). My question is simple: Does there exist any other dialects of English that exhibit a counterfactual construction similar to the ''liketa'' variant mentioned above? Also, are there any other languages that display a similar construction? Thanks for your help! Mike Putnam mtputnam umich.edu
Linguistic Field(s):
Syntax
Message 2: Calculating Language Ages from Clinical Examination of Language Fundamentals Subtests
|
Date: 06-Jun-2006
From: Nick Riches <nick.riches googlemail.com>
Subject: Calculating Language Ages from Clinical Examination of Language Fundamentals Subtests
Hi For a project investigating language difficulties in autism (looking specifically at phonological working memory) I have used a couple of CELF (Clinical Examination of Language Fundamentals) tasks as a screening measure. The two tasks are Concepts and Directions and Sentence Recall, and we selected these them as rough indicators of overall language abilities. We would like to use the scores from these tasks to select a language-age matched group, but there is not enough information in Manual to determine the language age with any degree of accuracy. Can anyone think of a way to get language ages based on these two subtests? Nick Riches Guys Hospital / Kings College London
Linguistic Field(s):
Psycholinguistics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|