LINGUIST List 17.1926
|
Fri Jun 30 2006
Diss: Syntax: Goldberg: Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A cross-ling...
Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer
<sawyer linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Lotus
Goldberg,
Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study
Message 1: Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study
|
Date: 29-Jun-2006
From: Lotus Goldberg <lmgold brandeis.edu>
Subject: Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study
Institution: McGill University
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2005
Author: Lotus Goldberg
Dissertation Title: Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study
Dissertation URL: http://www.lotusgoldberg.net/dissertation.html
Linguistic Field(s):
Syntax
Dissertation Director:
Jason Merchant
Lisa deMena Travis
Dissertation Abstract:
This thesis presents a study of a construction which I refer to as Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis. The construction is studied here, specifically, in two distinct senses. First, diagnostics are proposed by which the VP Ellipsis ("VPE") construction can be identified—irrespective of whether the main verb involved is null or overt. It is proposed that these diagnostics can be used to rule out the possibility that the data at issue are cases of other types of null anaphora, such as null arguments, Stripping, Gapping, and Null Complement Anaphora. It emerges from this section of the thesis that Modern Hebrew, Modern Irish, and Swahili have V-Stranding VPE data which form a natural class with English's Aux-Stranding VPE, while Japanese, Korean, Italian, and Spanish do not. The second focus is the question of how V-Stranding VPE should be generated. I argue in favor of an analysis involving PF Deletion of a VP out of which the main verb has raised, and against an LF Copying treatment. These arguments, in part, involve the Verbal Identity Requirement on VP Ellipsis, a novel generalization involving strict identity in root and derivational morphology between the antecedent- and target-clause main Vs of the construction. Within the previously known requirement that elided phrases express semantically Given information, I argue that this generalization results from the fact that the head of an elided phrase must itself express Given information—whether or not the head surfaces as phonologically null.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|