LINGUIST List 17.2131
|
Mon Jul 24 2006
Qs: Speech Analysis and Sound File Formats
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
<kevin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Mario
Cal Varela,
Speech Analysis and Sound File Formats
Message 1: Speech Analysis and Sound File Formats
|
Date: 19-Jul-2006
From: Mario Cal Varela <iamario usc.es>
Subject: Speech Analysis and Sound File Formats
Dear linguists, I'd like to compare digital speech samples collected from different sources, including online radio and samples digitized by myself from analogical sources. I'm specially interested in fundamental frequency and formant position, as well as time-related aspects of segments (specifically VOT and vowel duration). My questions are the following: What features of the speech signal (and in what ways) may be affected by the format of speech samples (MP3, VAV, stream audio...)? Are the results of spectrographic analysis of samples with different file formats and qualities comparable? Is there any relevant bibliography available on this issue? Thanks a lot in advance. I'll post a summary. Mario Cal Varela University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Linguistic Field(s):
Phonetics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|