LINGUIST List 17.2735
|
Mon Sep 25 2006
Qs: Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
<kevin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Sarah
Collie,
Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory
Message 1: Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory
|
Date: 20-Sep-2006
From: Sarah Collie <sejcolliehotmail.com>
Subject: Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory
Dear colleagues
As part of my PhD dissertation I am looking at English non-primary stress
in Optimality Theory. I am yet to come across an optimality-theoretic
analysis which distinguishes between different degrees of non-primary
stress, i.e. secondary versus tertiary. Can anyone point me to an OT
analysis (of any language) which formally recognises tertiary stress? Or is
this problematic in OT?
Many thanks
Sarah Collie
University of Edinburgh
Linguistic Field(s):
Linguistic Theories
Phonology
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
