* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 17.2849

Sun Oct 01 2006

Sum: Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory

Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevinlinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Sarah Collie, Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory


Message 1: Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory
Date: 29-Sep-2006
From: Sarah Collie <sejcolliehotmail.com>
Subject: Tertiary Stress and Optimality Theory


Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 17.2735



Regarding Query: http://linguistlist.org/issues/17/17-2735.html

Original query:

As part of my PhD dissertation I am looking at English non-primary stress
in Optimality Theory. I am yet to come across an optimality-theoretic
analysis which distinguishes between different degrees of non-primary
stress, i.e. secondary versus tertiary. Can anyone point me to an OT
analysis (of any language) which formally recognises tertiary stress? Or is
this problematic in OT?

Both Eric Bakovic and James Fidelholtz were kind enough to respond to this
query; I hope to represent their responses accurately here.

Both replies were keen to point out that tertiary stress in any
'significant' or 'phonological' sense has long since been rejected with the
advent of theories like Metrical Phonology. I must apologise for my
original question being misleading in its wording in this respect.

Both responses indicated that OT, like earlier metrical theory, should (in
principle) have no particular problem in distinguishing between the
relative prominence levels of predictably-assigned foot heads so that a
level of tertiary stress could be discerned. As yet I am still unaware of
any OT analysis which does this.

Many thanks indeed to James Fidelholtz and Eric Bakovic

Sarah Collie
University of Edinburgh

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
Phonology
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.