LINGUIST List 17.2889
|
Wed Oct 04 2006
Qs: Holistic vs. Objective Assessments of Proficiency
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
<kevin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Alex
Housen,
Holistic vs. Objective Assessments of Proficiency
Message 1: Holistic vs. Objective Assessments of Proficiency
|
Date: 04-Oct-2006
From: Alex Housen <Alex.Housenvub.ac.be>
Subject: Holistic vs. Objective Assessments of Proficiency
Dear colleagues,
Can anyone point me to (preferably recent) studies which address both the
reliability and validity of holistic evaluations vis-à-vis more objective
measures of proficiency (oral or written) in a first or second language?
Linguistic Field(s):
Language Acquisition
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
