LINGUIST List 17.313
|
Mon Jan 30 2006
Qs: Suppletive Comparative Adjectives; Dictionaries
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
<jessica linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Jonathan
Bobaljik,
Suppletive Comparative Adjectives
2. Sarah
Harmon,
Frankish and (Classical) Arabic Dictionaries
Message 1: Suppletive Comparative Adjectives
|
Date: 30-Jan-2006
From: Jonathan Bobaljik <jonathan.bobaljik uconn.edu>
Subject: Suppletive Comparative Adjectives
For a current project, I would like to consult a list of adjectives that undergo suppletion in the formation of the comparative, as in English (and other Indo-European languages): good --> better (*gooder) A pointer to a reference would be very welcome. On the chance that no comprehensive list has been compiled, I am interested in collecting examples, and will put a list together. Thanks,
Linguistic Field(s):
Morphology
Typology
Message 2: Frankish and (Classical) Arabic Dictionaries
|
Date: 28-Jan-2006
From: Sarah Harmon <seharmon yahoo.com>
Subject: Frankish and (Classical) Arabic Dictionaries
In my dissertation work, I have needed to get etymologies for several Romance words which have roots in various super- and sub-strata. However, I am at a loss for a Frankish 'dictionary', as well as one for (Classical) Arabic which has the word in question written in both Roman and Arabic script. For many of the words I have their meanings, but some I do not; additionally, I need the genders of the words in question. Any resources would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance, Sarah Harmon Doctoral Candidate in Romance Linguistics The University of Texas at Austin
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Subject Language(s): Arabic, Standard (arb)
Luxembourgeois (ltz)
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|