* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 17.3142

Thu Oct 26 2006

Calls: Applied Linguistics/Sociolinguistics

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannahlinguistlist.org>


As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in the text. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Pauline Bryant, Current Issues in Language Planning


Message 1: Current Issues in Language Planning
Date: 25-Oct-2006
From: Pauline Bryant <pauline.bryantanu.edu.au>
Subject: Current Issues in Language Planning


Full Title: Current Issues in Language Planning


Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics;Sociolinguistics

Call Deadline: 30-Nov-2006

Second Call

Language Planning (LP) for naming, an aspect of corpus planning, covers a
broad spectrum from laws affecting personal names, to government
regulations on toponyms, to international standards in scientific
nomenclature, to standardised naming practices by organisations and groups.
This issue of Current Issues in Language Planning (CILP) will focus on both
broad policy issues in polities and organisations and on specific instances
of LP in relation to naming. Papers of up to 8,000 words are invited,
though short focused papers would also be appropriate. Abstracts of about
300 words should be sent to Pauline.Bryantanu.edu.au by 30 November 2006,
and final papers by 28 February 2007. Information on Current Issues in
Language Planning, including guidelines for authors, is at www.cilp.net.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.