* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 17.3449

Wed Nov 22 2006


Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevinlinguistlist.org>

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Jean-Charles Khalifa, SEE and CAUSE

Message 1: SEE and CAUSE
Date: 18-Nov-2006
From: Jean-Charles Khalifa <jckricky.univ-poitiers.fr>
Subject: SEE and CAUSE

Dear all,

Still working on the fuzzy boundary between causatives and perception
verbs, I have started looking at the English SEE-construction in examples
like :

She saw him to the door
They saw her home
I'll see you to the airport
See a book through

I was wondering

1) whether there has been any in-depth work at all, in any framework, on
such constructions
2) whether there were languages exhibiting such meanings with verbs
meaning SEE or any other perception verb.

Thanks in advance, I'll post a summary if need be.

Jean-Charles Khalifa
University of Poitiers, France

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.