LINGUIST List 17.3508
|
Tue Nov 28 2006
Diss: Syntax/Semantics/Lang Acq: Hodgson: 'Telicity and the Syntax-...'
Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales
<hannah linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Miren
Hodgson,
Telicity and the Syntax-Semantics of the Object and Subject
Message 1: Telicity and the Syntax-Semantics of the Object and Subject
|
Date: 27-Nov-2006
From: Miren Hodgson <mhodgsonspanport.umass.edu>
Subject: Telicity and the Syntax-Semantics of the Object and Subject
Institution: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Program: Department of Spanish and Portuguese
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2006
Author: Miren J. Hodgson
Dissertation Title: Telicity and the Syntax-Semantics of the Object and Subject
Linguistic Field(s):
Language Acquisition
Semantics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
Spanish (spa)
Dissertation Director:
Tom Roeper
Peggy Speas
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation presents a study on the acquisition of telicity by
Spanish and English native speakers. In addition to the study of
acquisition, it investigates the syntactic and semantic properties of
locatum constructions (e.g., the water filled the bucket), which are
sentences that contain two internal arguments and whose subject is
non-agentive. This dissertation explores the syntactic and semantic
properties of elements of the verb phrase that had not been previously
considered in the interpretation of telicity, such as the role of
non-agentive subjects and the type of movement that takes place in the
checking of the verb's telic features.
Contrary to the assumption that only the direct internal argument of the
verb can delimit an event, I argue that objects generated in the lower verb
phrase, by virtue of being an internal argument of the verb can delimit an
event. An object delimits an event by checking the verb's telic features
in spec-AspP, either by covert or overt movement. If a predicate contains
one internal argument (e.g., the boy filled the bucket) the checking of the
verb's telic features takes place via covert movement. That is, only the
NPs specific quantification features move covertly to check the verb's
telic features in spec-AspP. However, if the predicate contains two
internal arguments (e.g., fill the bucket with water), the surfaced subject
(e.g., the water filled the bucket) by virtue of being an internal argument
of the verb, checks the verb's telic features as the category and its
features move overtly to subject position.
The study shows that young children understand telicity when the verb's
telic features are checked via overt movement, but have difficulties
understanding telicity when the verb's telic features are checked via
covert movement. I propose that predicates whose telicity involves overt
movement should be acquired earlier than predicates whose telicity involves
covert movement because overt movement is an operation that happens between
D-structure and S-structure before the sentence is pronounced. Predicates
whose telicity involves covert movement might be acquired at a later age of
development because covert movement happens between S-structure and LF
after the sentence is pronounced.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
