LINGUIST List 17.3589
|
Tue Dec 05 2006
Diss: Philosophy of Lang/Semantics: Maier: 'Belief in Context: Towa...'
Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales
<hannah linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Emar
Maier,
Belief in Context: Towards a unified semantics of de re and de se attitude reports
Message 1: Belief in Context: Towards a unified semantics of de re and de se attitude reports
|
Date: 03-Dec-2006
From: Emar Maier <emar.maier gmail.com>
Subject: Belief in Context: Towards a unified semantics of de re and de se attitude reports
Institution: Radboud University Nijmegen
Program: Department of Philosophy
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2006
Author: Emar Maier
Dissertation Title: Belief in Context: Towards a unified semantics of de re and de se attitude reports
Dissertation URL: http://www.ru.nl/ncs/~emar/diss/
Linguistic Field(s):
Philosophy of Language
Pragmatics
Semantics
Dissertation Director:
Bart Geurts
Rob van der Sandt
Dissertation Abstract:
This thesis deals with the phenomenon of attitude reporting. More specifically, it provides a unified semantics of de re and de se belief reports. After arguing that de se belief is best thought of as a special case of de re belief, I examine whether we can extend this unification to the realm of belief reports. I show how, despite very promising first steps, previous attempts in this direction ultimately fail with respect to some relatively recent linguistic data involving quantified and infinitival reports, logophoric constructions, and monstrously shifted indexicals. Formalizing my idea of a contextual resolution of acquaintance relations in a dynamic framework, I arrive at an alternative analysis that handles all these data.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|