LINGUIST List 17.3646|
Sat Dec 09 2006
Qs: Perfect/Anterior Auxiliaries
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Message 1: Perfect/Anterior Auxiliaries
From: Brenda Laca <Brenda.Lacalinguist.jussieu.fr>
Subject: Perfect/Anterior Auxiliaries
Modern Portuguese builds its compound tenses with an auxiliary which
–though now used as a general verb of possession- etymologically meant
“hold, maintain, retain”. In Bybee et al. sample (Bybee/Perkins/Pagliuca,
The Evolution of grammar) there are scarcely any instances of ''anteriors''
with an auxiliary verb which is not simply stative, but
''intransformative'' or ''continuative''.
I would be thankful for other potential cases of anteriors/perfects built
on the basis of verbs meaning ''hold, keep, retain, stay, remain'' and the
like, as well as for descriptive references on their use.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.