LINGUIST List 17.599|
Thu Feb 23 2006
Qs: Concordance Programs; Rising Tone in Thai
Editor for this issue: James Rider
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Evolution of Rising Tone in Thai
Message 1: Concordance Programs
From: Chris Coleman <ccolemanuga.edu>
Subject: Concordance Programs
I am engaged in a campaign to encourage psychologists and writing
instructors to perform quantitative analyses of student writing samples. I
believe the professionals in question would be willing to give attention to
certain linguistic features (e.g., mean word frequency, mean word length,
some form of type-token ratio) if they had access to a concordance program
that would generate such counts for them.
These professionals do not have funding to pay for such software, however,
so I'm soliciting opinions about FREE concordance programs that might be
out there. I'm familiar with TextSTAT and AntConc, but they are not so easy
to use. Additionally, with both you run into the problem of needing to
adjust the text files first (e.g., deleting apostrophes) in order to avoid
erroneous counts (e.g., can't being coded as 'can' and 't').
Any advice would be appreciated,
UGA Dept of Psychology
Message 2: Evolution of Rising Tone in Thai
From: Vincent Chanethom <vchanethsyr.edu>
Subject: Evolution of Rising Tone in Thai
In Modern Thai, rising tones do not occur on (voiceless) obstruent final
syllables (CVO, CVVO), including syllables closed by glottal stops.
However, it has been suggested that post-vocalic glottal stops historically
induced raising the ending pitch of words resulting in rising tones. I am
seeking an explanation to these seemingly contradictory facts. In
particular, I welcome responses that appeal to a physiological account. I
will post a summary if warranted.
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.