LINGUIST List 17.645|
Wed Mar 01 2006
Disc: Hiring Practices in Variationist Sociolinguistics
Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Hiring Practices in Variationist Sociolinguistics
Message 1: Hiring Practices in Variationist Sociolinguistics
From: Richard Cameron <rcameronuic.edu>
Subject: Hiring Practices in Variationist Sociolinguistics
This academic year has been, I believe, a good year for academic hiring in
linguistics in the United States. As a consequence, I have paid attention to job
announcements in my principal area of expertise, Variationist Sociolinguistics.
I have a few questions, then, for the Variationist community in the U.S. about a
pattern of hiring practice that I have observed. I will begin with two
In those U.S. Departments of Linguistics, which
(A) offer a PhD, and which
(B) employ Variationists with their primary appointment in those
departments, these Variationists work primarily or exclusively on
English or English-lexified Creoles.
In those Linguistics Departments, which offer a Ph.D., and which arecurrently
hiring Variationists, the short-listed candidates work primarilyor exclusively
on English or English-lexified Creoles.
Is this, in general, an accurate description? I know of two exceptions. No more.
If this is accurate, why is this the practice when the annual NWAV conference
has presenters on many other languages besides English?
Do similar English-only hiring practices occur for other branches of
linguistics in the US? If so, which branches? Why?
Is this a good thing for the future of Variationist Sociolinguistics? If yes,
why? If no, why not?
If I receive any responses, I will post the responses.
Thank you - Richard Cameron
Linguistic Field(s): Sociolinguistics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.