LINGUIST List 17.912|
Fri Mar 24 2006
Qs: Pronominal Gender Languages; Native Speakers
Editor for this issue: James Rider
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Pronominal Gender Languages
'Outperforming' Native Speakers
Message 1: Pronominal Gender Languages
From: Jenny Audring <j.audringlet.vu.nl>
Subject: Pronominal Gender Languages
Languages can mark grammatical gender on different linguistic elements:
nouns, articles, adjectives, verbs, pronouns, as well as on more exotic
sites. Some languages may have gender agreement on several of these
elements, others may mark it on one element only. I am looking for
languages that mark gender ONLY ON PERSONAL PRONOUNS. This is the case in
the Niger-Congo language Defaka, for example. This language has a gender
system that is reflected only in the forms of the pronoun (Jenewari 1983:
103-106, Corbett 1991: 12, 169). One pronoun is used for female humans,
another for male humans and a third for all other referents. Of course,
English is another example of such a system.
I would be grateful for pointers to other languages that function this way.
I would like to know which genders these languages have, what the
gender-marked pronouns look like and for which words or which referents
they are used. Some languages with more extensive gender marking have
genders conditioned by the phonology or morphology of the noun. Thus, in
addition to some semantic rules, the East Cushitic language Afar assigns
feminine gender to all nouns whose citation form ends in an accented vowel
and masculine gender to all others (Parker & Hayward 1985: 225, Corbett
1991: 51). Other languages may assign gender on the basis of declension
class; this has been claimed, among others, for Russian (Corbett 1991 and
elsewhere). It would be interesting to see if PRONOMINAL gender could be
conditioned in this way. A hypothetical example would be a language that
uses the masculine pronoun for all nouns ending in a consonant and the
feminine pronoun for all nouns ending in a vowel.
So far, I am aware of the following languages with pronominal gender:
Yazgulyam (Iranian, IE)
Chalcatongo Mixtec (Oto–Maguean)
Khmu (Austro–Asiatic, Mon–Khmer)
Diyari (Australian, Pama-Nyungan)
Some of these languages have complicating properties. It would be ideal to
know for the candidate language:
- Are the pronouns free forms, bound forms (clitics or affixes)? If they
are affixes, where do they attach to?
- Do the pronouns show resemblance to classifying nouns (such as 'man',
'woman', 'animal', ...)?
- Can the pronouns be used in attributive position (e.g. as determiners or
possessives) and then agree with the noun to which they are attributed?
- Is there any residual agreement on other types of word (e.g. on the verb
meaning 'to be' or any other element that may have retained agreement
markers from an earlier stage in the history of the language)?
It would also be useful to know if the language used to have a more
extensive gender system in its history or if, on the contrary, it is just
developing a gender agreement system.
I will post a summary.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Message 2: 'Outperforming' Native Speakers
From: Nigel Duffield <n.g.duffieldsheffield.ac.uk>
Subject: 'Outperforming' Native Speakers
I have recently become interested in a phenomenon in SLA, where
intermediate and advanced L2 learners ''outperform'' native speakers in
acceptability judgment tasks (both implicit and explicit tasks). By
''outperform'' I intend instances where L2 learners' judgments agree better
with those of (native-speaker) *theoretical linguists* than do those of
naive native-speakers (the so-called ''control subjects''). I have observed
this pattern of results in various tasks looking at distinct morphological
and syntactic phenomena, and have already made some tentative efforts to
explain it (see for example, Moderne Sprachen 48: 95-117).
I would very much like to know, though, how general this phenomenon is
(hopefully, it's not just an artefact of my own experimental methods!).
Therefore if other colleagues have observed similar odd results in their
own experiments, I would be most grateful if they would let me know. Please
contact me directly, and I will summarise for the List. Thanks very much.
This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $52,932. This money will go to help keep the
List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.
See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 2006
LINGUIST List Cruise for some Fund Drive fun!
There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!
You can donate right now using our secure credit card form.
Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later.
For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to donate by
check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:
The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such can
receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non Profit
organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be offset against
your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers only). For more
information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.
Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any gift
you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting your human
resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills in and returns
to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure that doubles the
value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment
to check if your company operates such a program.
Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!
We would like to thank all of the publishers and subscribers who
donated prizes for this year's Fund Drive games, puzzles, and
Publisher Prize Donors:
Estudios de Sociolingüística
The Linguistic Association of Finland
The Surrey Morphology Group
Subscriber Prize Donors:
Paul G. Chapin
Dr. Gabriel Dorta
Suzette Haden Elgin
Elly van Gelderen
Loraine K. Obler, Ph.D
Ana María Ortega and María Luisa Pérez
The LINGUIST List Hall of Fame
ANGELS ($1000 and over)
MAINSTAYS ($100 to $1000)
A. Henderson, S. Moran, G. Stamm
Arienne M. Dwyer
Bernadine W. Raiskums
Cynthia Tia Linn Johnson
D Terence Langendoen
elly van gelderen
Geoff Nathan and Margaret Winters
Helen Aristar-Dry & Anthony Aristar
Monica Macaulay and Joe Salmons
Pius ten Hacken
Stefan Th. Gries
University of Pennsylvania Linguistics Club
- Plus 5 anonymous donors
SUPPORTERS ($50 to $100)
Andrea C. Schalley
Carol A. Klee
Georgetown University - Graduate Student Linguistics Association
Job M. van Zuijlen
Josep M. Fontana and Louise McNally
Kathleen M. Ward
Student Linguistics Asso, the Ohio State University
Susan Windisch Brown
Wolfgang J. Meyer
- Plus 5 anonymous donors
DONORS (Up to $50)
Brook Danielle Lillehaugen
Christel de Bruijn
Donald F. Reindl
Elisabeth COTTIER FÁBIÁN
Pierre Francois Cintas
Sandra W. Smith
Susan D Fischer
V J Fedson
- Plus 5 anonymous donors
MAJOR SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
Cambridge University Press
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd
Edinburgh University Press
European Language Resources Association
Georgetown University Press
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Mouton de Gruyter
Oxford University Press
OTHER SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc. Umass
International Pragmatics Assoc.
Kingston Press Ltd
Linguistic Assoc. of Finland
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd.
Utrecht institute of Linguistics
Arizona State University
Birkbeck, University of London
CACI International Inc.
City University of Hong Kong
Dublin City University
European Bioinformatics Institute
Franklin Electronic Publishers, Inc.
Harvard University Institute of English Language
Language Analysis Systems, Inc.
Michigan State University
National Security Agency
National Tsing Hua University
Northeastern Illinois University
OFAI - Austrian Research Inst. for AI
Simon Fraser University
SYSTRAN Software Inc.
Szanca Solutions, Inc.
Thomson Legal & Regulatory
United Arab Emirates University
University of Alberta
University of British Columbia
University of Calgary
University of Cambridge
University of Chicago
University of Cincinnati
University of Cyprus
University of Edinburgh
University of Florida
University of Fribourg, Suisse
University of Goettingen
University of Hamburg
University of Heidelberg
University of Helsinki
University of Illinois
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
University of Konstanz
University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
University of Leipzig
University of Maryland
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Melbourne
University of Michigan
University of Oregon
University of Pittsburgh
University of Potsdam
University of Reading
University of Rochester
University of Southampton
University of Southern Denmark
University of Texas at Austin
University of Victoria
Université de Neuchâtel
Université du Québec à Montréal
Voice Signal Technologies
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.