LINGUIST List 17.987|
Mon Apr 03 2006
Disc: Common Nouns;Capital Tresillo/Cuatrillo in Unicode
Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Re: 17.836, Why are there Common Nouns?
Re: 17.869, Capital Tresillo/Cuatrillo in Unicode
Message 1: Re: 17.836, Why are there Common Nouns?
From: Michael Covington <">uga.edu>>
Subject: Re: 17.836, Why are there Common Nouns?
My question was why human languages have chosen to encode some one-place
predicates (such as lambda(x).dog(x) ) as nouns, which are syntactically like
names (logical constants), rather than as adjectives (lambda(x).green(x) ) or verbs
Larry Horn gave me a very helpful reply, citing "Kripke's and Putnam's arguments
that common nouns are in many, perhaps most, cases names for kinds of things,
with extensions determined by direct reference, rather than descriptive entities
whose reference is determined via sense... In this case, the relation between
proper and common "names" is relatively natural."
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Harvard U. Press. Originally
published in a different format in Davidson & Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural
Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972.
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of meaning. Anthologized in various
places, including his _Mind, Language, and Reality, vol. 1_ (Cambridge U.
Press, 1975) and his Philosophical Papers (also CUP, 1975).
Rudy Troike pointed out that not all languages use common nouns for things
like lambda(x).dog(x). Hopi, for instance, can use a verb. He also mentions
that the key idea of the DP Hypothesis is that "noun phrases" (DP) and verb
phrases or sentences (IP, CP) are not as radically different as their names suggest.
Joyce McDonough and Eve Danziger added several more languages to the list of
those in which the equivalents of our common nouns need not be nouns.
Several people referred me to literature on *proper* nouns, and I haven't
digested all of it yet well enough to know whether it's relevant.
Isabelle Buchstaller referred me to:
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay on the philosophy of language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page 170 and thereabout.
Van Langendonck, W. (1999). Neurolinguistic and syntactic evidence for basic
level meaning in proper names. Functions of Language 6: 95-138.
Lewis Howe referred me to:
Burge, Tyler. 1973. Reference and Proper names. Journal of Philosophy
Dowty, David R., Robert E. Wall, and Stanley Peters. 1981. Introduction to
Montague Semantics. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Searle, John. 1958. Proper Names. Mind 67.166-173.
Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. New York: Doubleday.
Aubrey Nunes referred me to 2 recent books by Hagit Borer on the projection
of syntactic structures.
Thanks to all for responding!
Michael A. Covington - Associate Director
Artificial Intelligence Center - www.ai.uga.edu
The University of Georgia
111 Boyd GSRC, Athens, GA 30602-7415 U.S.A.
Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
Message 2: Re: 17.869, Capital Tresillo/Cuatrillo in Unicode
From: Jim Fidelholtz <fidelholtzgmail.com>
Subject: Re: 17.869, Capital Tresillo/Cuatrillo in Unicode
My comment is more about Unicode itself than the specific question. I
really know little about the details of this coding system, though its
aims, if I understand them, seem laudable; that is: to have a system which
in principle (and, presumably, with time, in fact) will have codings for
*all* orthographies, scripts, etc., with *any* relevance for *anyone*,
*anywhere*, at any time, past present &/or future. At least this is my
understanding, based on very limited facts, but on rather widespread
information from various sources, including LinguistList, and now the
'official' Unicode page. As I understand the coding, there is room for
2[up-arrow]16 characters, or something over 65000 characters. This seems
like a lot to me, but maybe it isn't (considering that Chinese has perhaps
several tens of thousands of characters all by itself, counting variants
and older ones). I don't understand why they cannot just add one or more
hexadecimal digits to the code, if it seems necessary, and use the lower
codes for the more common languages, perhaps forcing users of some less
common languages to use a (mandatory) switch in their software (or, perhaps
better, their computer) to switch to the higher codes (over decimal 65535).
This rambling preamble is basically supporting an argument for making it
relatively easy and quick to add characters, even on the apparently
flimsiest of arguments, so as not to leave any former, present or future
symbol-using system out of consideration. I would also emphasize that
computers have been very rapid now for close to two decades, and all
indications are that they will continue to get faster. Furthermore,
character manipulations (even multi-byte ones) are among the fastest things
done by computers, and more so when they are organized (compare the
response times to get many millions of answers from Google).
The suggestion, then, would be that, if Michael Everson wants capital
tresillo &/or cuatrillo, I'm willing to wait the extra couple of
nanoseconds that every single operation on characters will thereafter cost
me (temporarily), which in a couple of years will have speeded up by a
couple of orders of magnitude in any case. And if I don't meanwhile get a
new computer, I'm willing to suffer in silence (grousing would take more
time than the total I would lose, anyway).
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $52,932. This money will go to help keep the
List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.
See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 2006
LINGUIST List Cruise for some Fund Drive fun!
There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!
You can donate right now using our secure credit card form.
Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later.
For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to donate by
check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:
The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such can
receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non Profit
organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be offset against
your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers only). For more
information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.
Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any gift
you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting your human
resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills in and returns
to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure that doubles the
value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment
to check if your company operates such a program.
Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!
We would like to thank all of the publishers and subscribers who
donated prizes for this year's Fund Drive games, puzzles, and
Publisher Prize Donors:
Estudios de Sociolingüística
The Linguistic Association of Finland
The Surrey Morphology Group
Subscriber Prize Donors:
Paul G. Chapin
Dr. Gabriel Dorta
Suzette Haden Elgin
Elly van Gelderen
Loraine K. Obler, Ph.D
Ana María Ortega and María Luisa Pérez
The LINGUIST List Hall of Fame
ANGELS ($1000 and over)
MAINSTAYS ($100 to $1000)
A. Henderson, S. Moran, G. Stamm
Arienne M. Dwyer
Barbara H Partee
Bernadine W. Raiskums
CaroLyn Green Hartnett
Columbia School Linguistic Society
Cynthia Tia Linn Johnson
D Terence Langendoen
Dr. MJ Hardman
Elaine J. Francis and Alexander L. Francis
Ellen Woolford and John McCarthy
elly van gelderen
Emily M. Bender
Emmon W Bach
Geoff Nathan and Margaret Winters
Helen Aristar-Dry & Anthony Aristar
Jason Boston and Marisa Ferrara
Kristy Beers Fägersten
Monica Macaulay and Joe Salmons
Pacific Languages Unit, USP
Pius ten Hacken
Stefan Th. Gries
University of Pennsylvania Linguistics Club
Wynn Chao and Emmon Bach
- Plus 5 anonymous donors
SUPPORTERS ($50 to $100)
Aaron Huey Sonnenschein
Adam and Andy Ussishkin and Wedel
Alice Turk & Bert Remijsen
Andrea C. Schalley
Carol A. Klee
Christina Villafana Dalcher
Claus D. Pusch
Francesca Del Gobbo
Georgetown University - Graduate Student Linguistics Association
Hernan Emilio Perez
Job M. van Zuijlen
Josep M. Fontana and Louise McNally
Juan Carlos Rubio
kar lok Leung
Kathleen M. Ward
Linguistica Occitana (www.revistadoc.org)
Pier Marco Bertinetto
Roderick A. Jacobs
Student Linguistics Asso, the Ohio State University
Susan Windisch Brown
Thor Sigurd Nilsen
Wolfgang J. Meyer
- Plus 4 anonymous donors
DONORS (Up to $50)
Brook Danielle Lillehaugen
Christel de Bruijn
Donald F. Reindl
E. Allyn Smith
Elisabeth COTTIER FÁBIÁN
Janet M. Smith
Janneke ter Beek
Jorge E Porras
Pierre Francois Cintas
Raffaella Zanuttini and Bob Frank
Sandra W. Smith
Susan D Fischer
V J Fedson
Xose Luis Regueira-Fernandez
Yuri & Mio Backhaus
- Plus 14 anonymous donors
MAJOR SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
Cambridge University Press
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd
Edinburgh University Press
European Language Resources Association
Georgetown University Press
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Mouton de Gruyter
Oxford University Press
OTHER SUPPORTING PUBLISHERS
Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc. Umass
International Pragmatics Assoc.
Kingston Press Ltd
Linguistic Assoc. of Finland
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd.
Utrecht institute of Linguistics
Arizona State University
Birkbeck, University of London
CACI International Inc.
City University of Hong Kong
Dublin City University
EML Research gGmbH
European Academy Bozen/Bolzano
European Bioinformatics Institute
European Science Foundation ESF
Franklin Electronic Publishers, Inc.
Harvard University Institute of English Language
International Linguistic Association
Language Analysis Systems, Inc.
Michigan State University
National Security Agency
National Tsing Hua University
Northeastern Illinois University
OFAI - Austrian Research Inst. for AI
Simon Fraser University
SYSTRAN Software Inc.
Szanca Solutions, Inc.
Thomson Legal & Regulatory
University of Alberta
University of British Columbia
University of Calgary
University of Cambridge
University of Chicago
University of Cincinnati
University of Cyprus
University of Edinburgh
University of Florida
University of Fribourg, Suisse
University of Geneva - ETI
University of Goettingen
University of Hamburg
University of Heidelberg
University of Helsinki
University of Illinois
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
University of Konstanz
University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
University of Leipzig
University of Maryland
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Melbourne
University of Michigan
University of Oregon
University of Pittsburgh
University of Potsdam
University of Reading
University of Rochester
University of Southampton
University of Southern Denmark
University of Texas at Austin
University of Victoria
Université de Neuchâtel
Université du Québec à Montréal
Voice Signal Technologies
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.