LINGUIST List 18.1340|
Thu May 03 2007
Qs: Sibilants; Systematic & Accidental Gaps
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Systematic & Accidental Gaps
Message 1: Sibilants
From: Don Killian <donald.killianhelsinki.fi>
I'm a current graduate student at the University of Helsinki, and for my
thesis I'll be researching one dialect of Finnish spoken in Helsinki, in
which sibilants tend to be pronounced more sharply, perhaps either as
dental or perhaps as more apical. (I need to research that still). I'll
be comparing phonetic features between standard Finnish /s/ and the
I was looking for recommendations for any resources anyone might know
regarding research on sibilants in other languages, or also Finnish if you
happen to know of any previous work. Works focusing on more detailed
analysis of sibilants would be preferred, but survey works or comparitive
studies are also of interest.
I'll post a summary afterwards. Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear!
Department of Speech Sciences
University of Helsinki
Message 2: Systematic & Accidental Gaps
From: James Kirby <jkirbyuchicago.edu>
Subject: Systematic & Accidental Gaps
does anyone know of where, and by whom, the terms ''systemic gap'' and
''accidental gap'' were first used in the literature?
The notion of possible vs. impossible words has been around for some
time, of course, but I'm trying to find a citation for where the above
terminology was first introduced. Halle, for as much as he has discussed
possible and impossible words over the years, has never actually referred
to accidental or systematic gaps as far as I can tell (going back to Halle
1954, ''Why and How Do We Study the Sounds of Speech?'').
Thanks in advance,
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.