LINGUIST List 18.1462|
Mon May 14 2007
Qs: Research on Acquisition of Sluicing; DRT Translatable to FOL?
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Research on Acquisition of Sluicing
2. Wai Lok
DRT Translatable to FOL?
Message 1: Research on Acquisition of Sluicing
From: Wang Qiang <sequoiawangyahoo.com.cn>
Subject: Research on Acquisition of Sluicing
I am interested in the acquisition of sluicing in Chinese by Japanese and
Sluicing, since Ross(1967, 1969), has been receiving much attention.
However, we are still not quite confident in the current literature,
although there are PF-deletion and LF-copying accounts.
In the Chinese language in particular, the shi-support pertaining to the
wh-argument and wh-adjunct asymmetry seems to defy current theoretical
explanations. This makes it hard to have a sound arrangement of elicitation
and in turn a satisfactory analysis of the learner language data.
There must be some sources or theories, but I don't know where. Would you,
who are better read, tell me where?
Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition
Message 2: DRT Translatable to FOL?
From: Wai Lok Tam <tamuwairokkuyahoo.co.jp>
Subject: DRT Translatable to FOL?
FOL: first order logic
DRT: discourse representation theory
GQ: generalized quantifier
I see this (translatability of Discourse Representation Theory into First
Order Logic) mentioned in many places. But DRT does include generalized
quantifiers. How can it still be first order with GQ? And if it can be, how
is it done?
Linguistic Field(s): Philosophy of Language
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.