* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.1465

Mon May 14 2007

Sum: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers

Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevinlinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Myroslava Dzikovska, Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers


Message 1: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers
Date: 13-May-2007
From: Myroslava Dzikovska <mdzikovsinf.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Syntax of NP Coordination with PP Modifiers


Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 17.3584



A while ago I asked a question on the list regarding the syntax of NP
coordination with PP modifiers in the examples like
(1) The [boys and girls]_N' [in the picture]_PP are smiling
(2) [The man]_NP and [the woman]_NP [in the picture]_PP made an agreement

http://linguistlist.org/issues/17/17-3584.html

My question was how to treat this in the grammar, seeing that PP appears to
attach to N' in the first case, and NP in the second case. I received a
number of excellent suggestions, and I sincerely apologize that it took me
so long to post a summary to the list

The most common suggestion I received is to allow for the ambiguous
attachment both to N' and NP, citing examples from
Ray S. Jackendoff, in X' Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp. 191-192
and also a variety of cases where it is possible to attach PPs to pronouns,
such as ''John Smith from the bursar's office''.

Several people also suggested treating example (2) as right node rising.

Another suggestion was to check out the treatment in the ERG grammar.
Following up on that, I attempted to parse those and similar sentences
using the online ERG demo at http://www.delph-in.net
It appears that NPs are only allowed to modify N' in that version of the
grammar, returning the semantic interpretations of (2) where ''in the
picture'' modifies only ''woman''.

There is also related research on using underspecification with
coordination and with relative clause attachment

''Underspecification and NP Coordination in Constraint-based Grammar''
Chaves R. P. (2005), In F. Richter and M. Sailer (Eds.), Workshop on
Empirical Challenges and Analytical Alternatives to Strict
Compositionality, pp. 38-58, 17th ESSLLI, Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh, Scotland.

Magdalena Zoeppritz: Syntax for German in the User Specialty Languages
System, Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1984.

Tibor Kiss Semantic constraints on relative clause extraposition In:
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (2005) 23; 281 - 334.
http://www.linguistics.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~kiss/publications.html

Many thanks to the following people for helpful comments and examples
Emily Bender
Rui Pedro Chaves
Soyoung Kang
Michael T. Wescoat
Shuichi Vatabe
Martin Haspelmath
Magdalena Zoeppritz
Bingfu Lu
Stefan Muller

Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
Semantics
Syntax


Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.