* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.1521

Fri May 18 2007

Disc: Semantic vs. Pragmatic Interpretation

Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer <sawyerlinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    José-Luis Guijarro, Semantic vs. Pragmatic Interpretation

Message 1: Semantic vs. Pragmatic Interpretation
Date: 18-May-2007
From: José-Luis Guijarro <joseluis.guijarrouca.es>
Subject: Semantic vs. Pragmatic Interpretation

In re: LINGUIST List Query http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-1463.html#2 

This is a possible answer to Arash Golzari:

According to Grice, human communication is achieved in a process that he
terms ''reading the mind'' of interlocutors, and THEN, making out the
meaning of what has been said.

Sperber & Wilson insist on this idea and show us that we look for and
thereafter choose RELEVANT contexts in which the sentences we hear or read
may acquire some sense for us.

So, the real way we proceed is (1) We try to make sense of whatever
stimulus we notice, (2) We decode the meaning of the sentence that may be
the gist of this stimulus, (3) We accept it if it seems relevant for us.

In other words:

We start with pragmatic inferencing from premises offered by (1) our chosen
context AND (2) from those offered by the decoded meaning of the sentence
uttered, checking its relevance and if it's ok, then we don't look for
more. If not, we try again.

I hope this makes sense!


Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.