LINGUIST List 18.2436
|
Sat Aug 18 2007
Qs: Word Order of Cardinals
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
<dan linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Bingfu
Lu,
Word Order of Cardinals
Message 1: Word Order of Cardinals
|
Date: 18-Aug-2007
From: Bingfu Lu <lubingfu yahoo.com>
Subject: Word Order of Cardinals
E-mail this message to a friend
Dear colleagues, A colleague of mine is investigating the word order of ordinal numerals. Based on her database of 112 languages in China, she got the following implicational universal: If ordinal numeral precedes the head noun, cardinal numerals does as well. Her data as shown below: Ord-N & Card-N 53 N-Ord & N-Card 52 N-Ord & Card-N 15 N-Ord & N-Card 0 (some languages has two orders, therefore, the total numbers of languages above is larger than 112). We want to know the possible counterexamples and relevant literature and data in other languages. In addition, in some languages, cardinals morphologically belongs to adjectives, such as Russian. We also need to know other languages where cardinals morphologically are adjectives. Replies to this inquiry can be send to my colleague Renping Jiang (renpingjiang 126.com) and me. Bingfu Lu Institute of Linguistics
Linguistic Field(s):
Typology
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|