LINGUIST List 18.2476
|
Thu Aug 23 2007
Calls: Cognitive Science, Pragmatics, Semantics/South Korea
Editor for this issue: Jeremy Taylor
<jeremy linguistlist.org>
|
As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations
or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in
the text. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Chungmin
Lee,
Contrastiveness and/or Scalar Implicatures
Message 1: Contrastiveness and/or Scalar Implicatures
|
Date: 23-Aug-2007
From: Chungmin Lee <clee snu.ac.kr>
Subject: Contrastiveness and/or Scalar Implicatures
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Contrastiveness and/or Scalar Implicatures Short Title: Cand/orSI (CIL18) Date: 21-Jul-2008 - 26-Jul-2008 Location: Seoul, Korea, South Contact Person: Chungmin Lee Meeting Email: clee snu.ac.kr Web Site: http://www.cil18.org/ Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Pragmatics; Semantics Call Deadline: 31-Aug-2007 Meeting Description: Workshop on Contrastiveness in Information Structure and/or Scalar Implicatures will be held in conjunction with the 18th International Congress of Linguists (CIL 18)at Korea University, July 21-26, 2008. Abstract deadline: Aug 31, 2007. Send abstract to the organizer at clee snu.ac.kr . Visit the website (http://www.cil18.org/ ) or contact the organizer at clee snu.ac.kr. Abstract deadline: Aug 31, 2007. Organizers: Chungmin Lee Seoul Nat'l University clee snu.ac.kr Cell phone: 82-10-8286-3886 Fax: 82-2-880-1366 Ferenc Kiefer Hungarian Academy of Sciences kiefer nytud.hu Invited Speakers Manfred Krifka (Berlin-Humbuldt) Laurence Horn (Yale) Robert van Rooy (Amsterdam) Enric Vallduvi (Pompeu Fabra) Arthus Merin (Konstanz) Daniel Buring (UCLA) Description It is fairly well established by now that meaning is regarded as representing update potential rather than merely truth conditions, taking a dynamic perspective on semantics and/or pragmatics. Topic - Focus information structure becomes more complex because of discourse-connected, largely quantificational, contrastiveness; sets of alternatives are involved in Contrastive Topic and Contrastive Focus. Contrastiveness and the range of alternatives must be further explored. At the same time, sets of alternatives are required in the computation of scalar implicatures. What would be the range of relevant or comparable alternatives? Gricean, neo-Gricean, relevance-theoretic or other'relevant'? Utterances with Contrastive Topic generate scalar implicatures. How do other utterances generate scalar implicatures? Is the exhaustivity operator exh good enough? What would be an adequate representation - pragmatic, semantic or syntactic? How can a game-theoretic approach serve as a new model? What other scales work except Horn's entailment scales? We need a forum to discuss and resolve these cutting-edge issues. Important Dates: - August 31, 2007: Deadline for submitting the abstract. - November 30, 2007: Notification of acceptance. Form and submission of abstracts: An abstract(.pdf or .doc file) should be up to 3 pages long, including data and references. The abstract should start with the title of the paper, followed by the text of the abstract. Please do not include the author's name in the abstract. On a separate page, please give the author's name, affiliation, e-mail address, telephone number, mailing address, the paper title and the session number(title). Those who already submitted abstracts can submit their revised ones by the new deadline, stating it is for replacement. Invited speakers are also requested to send their abstracts (with their names) by the deadline to determine the number of selected abstracts. Please send the abstract and the author's information to both cil18 cil18.org and clee snu.ac.kr.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|