LINGUIST List 18.2687
|
Fri Sep 14 2007
Calls: Computational Linguistics/Linguistic Issues in Language... (Jrnl)
Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales
<hannah linguistlist.org>
|
As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations
or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in
the text. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Annie
Zaenen,
Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT)
Message 1: Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT)
|
Date: 12-Sep-2007
From: Annie Zaenen <zaenen parc.com>
Subject: Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT)
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT)
Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics; Computational Linguistics
Call Deadline: 31-Dec-2007
Call for submissions for new open access journal in Computational Linguistics (LiLT) Editors: Annie Zaenen, Bonnie Webber, Martha Palmer Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT) is a new open-access journal that focusses on relationships between linguistic insights, which can prove valuable to language technology, and language technology, which can enrich linguistic research. The Editorial Board of LiLT believes that, in conjunction with machine learning and statistical techniques, deeper and more sophisticated models of language are needed to make significant progress in newly emerging areas of computational language analysis. LiLT provides a forum for such work. We are eagerly awaiting your submissions, which will be published as soon as they are reviewed. For more information see: http://www-csli.stanford.edu/pubs/ (Under On-line Publications) LiLT is an LSA eLanguage journal (http://www.lsadc.org/info/pubs-elang-rfp.cfm) Deadline: 31 December 2007
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|