LINGUIST List 18.2762
|
Mon Sep 24 2007
Qs: Sri Lankan University Students
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
<dan linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Gavin
Austin,
Sri Lankan University Students
Message 1: Sri Lankan University Students
|
Date: 21-Sep-2007
From: Gavin Austin <gaustin2 une.edu.au>
Subject: Sri Lankan University Students
E-mail this message to a friend
Dear all, I'm writing a PhD on the L2 acquisition of English inflectional morphology, and I'm thinking of using Sri Lankan university students as one of my L1 groups. I'd like some advice about this. Ideally, I need to obtain data from L2ers at various levels of English proficiency; at the very least, I need data from intermediate and upper-intermediate speakers. My concern is that the proficiency of this particular L1 group will generally be too high for my purposes. If you know something about the proficiency of this group, one good way to indicate this would be in terms of IELTS scores. I've worked as an IELTS examiner, so this would give me a fairly accurate idea. Any assistance or advice would be greatly appreciated. Best, Gavin Austin U of New England (Australia)
Linguistic Field(s):
Language Acquisition
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|