* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.2763

Mon Sep 24 2007

Qs: Non-concatenative Word Formation

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <danlinguistlist.org>

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Getahun Amare, Non-concatenative Word Formation

Message 1: Non-concatenative Word Formation
Date: 19-Sep-2007
From: Getahun Amare <getahunamareyahoo.com>
Subject: Non-concatenative Word Formation
E-mail this message to a friend

In Semitic languages words, especially verbal stems are derived from
consonantal roots with vocalic insertion (vowel insertion between the
consonants. For instance, the verbal stem for 'killed' is derived from
g-dd-l by insrting the mid central vowel in the space indicated by (-)in
Argobba and Amharic. Derivations of this sort can be handled in Prosodic
Morphology. But I do not know if there are works to analyze such derivation
in Constraint Based theories like HPSG. Please inform me works on this issue.

Many thanks.
Getahun Amare

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.