* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.3159

Sun Oct 28 2007

Qs: The Language of Written Interviews

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <danlinguistlist.org>

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Gloria Cappelli, The Language of Written Interviews

Message 1: The Language of Written Interviews
Date: 25-Oct-2007
From: Gloria Cappelli <newslettergloriacappelli.it>
Subject: The Language of Written Interviews
E-mail this message to a friend

Dear Colleagues,

Can somebody recommend some article or book on the language of written
interviews (biographical or literary interviews in magazines, newspapers,
There seems to be a wealth of material on political interviews and on TV
interviews, but I haven’t been able to find anything specific on the
linguistic features of written interviews.

Thank you for your help.

Kind regards,

Gloria Cappelli

Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.