LINGUIST List 18.3269
|
Wed Nov 07 2007
Diss: Applied Ling: Sauro: 'A Comparative Study of Recasts and Meta...'
Editor for this issue: Luiza Newlin Lukowicz
<luiza linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Shannon
Sauro,
A Comparative Study of Recasts and Metalinguistic Feedback through Computer Mediated Communication on the Development of L2 Knowledge and Production Accuracy
Message 1: A Comparative Study of Recasts and Metalinguistic Feedback through Computer Mediated Communication on the Development of L2 Knowledge and Production Accuracy
|
Date: 05-Nov-2007
From: Shannon Sauro <shannon.sauroutsa.edu>
Subject: A Comparative Study of Recasts and Metalinguistic Feedback through Computer Mediated Communication on the Development of L2 Knowledge and Production Accuracy
 E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Pennsylvania
Program: Educational Linguistics program, Graduate School of Education
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2007
Author: Shannon Sauro
Dissertation Title: A Comparative Study of Recasts and Metalinguistic Feedback through Computer Mediated Communication on the Development of L2 Knowledge and Production Accuracy
Linguistic Field(s):
Applied Linguistics
Dissertation Director:
Carol A. Chapelle
Yuko Goto-Butler
Teresa Pica
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation built upon face to face comparison studies of corrective
feedback (e.g., Carroll, 2001; Carroll & Swain, 1993; Ellis, Loewen &
Erlam, 2006; Hino, 2006) to investigate the impact of two different
approaches to corrective feedback administered during written synchronous
computer-mediated communication (SCMC) on the development of adult
learners' L2 knowledge and production accuracy: corrective feedback that
reformulates the error in the form of recasts and corrective feedback that
supplies the learner with metalinguistic information about the nature of
the error. Four research questions guided this study: (1) Which type of
corrective feedback when delivered via written SCMC is more effective for
immediate gains in L2 knowledge? (2) Which type of corrective feedback when
delivered via written SCMC is more effective for gains in L2 knowledge over
time? (3) Which type of corrective feedback when delivered via written SCMC
is more effective for immediate gains in L2 production accuracy? (4) Which
type of corrective feedback when delivered via written SCMC is more
effective for gains in L2 production accuracy over time? High intermediate
to advanced adult Swedish university learners of English (n=23) from an
intact class were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (two
feedback conditions and one control) and were randomly paired with English
native speakers. During task-based interaction via text-chat, the Swedish
learners received focused corrective feedback on omission of the zero
article with noncount nouns of generic reference (e.g. employment, global
warming, culture). Pretests, posttests and delayed posttests of knowledge
(acceptability judgments) and production accuracy (short-answer questions)
measured learning outcomes. Results showed a significant advantage for
metalinguistic information on the immediate development of target form
knowledge with noncount nouns of generic reference that had been introduced
during the intervention.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
