LINGUIST List 18.3447
|
Mon Nov 19 2007
Diss: Semantics: Koskela: 'Vertical Polysemy: a study in the dynami...'
Editor for this issue: Luiza Newlin Lukowicz
<luiza linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Anu
Koskela,
Vertical Polysemy: a study in the dynamicity of meaning
Message 1: Vertical Polysemy: a study in the dynamicity of meaning
|
Date: 18-Nov-2007
From: Anu Koskela <amk21 sussex.ac.uk>
Subject: Vertical Polysemy: a study in the dynamicity of meaning
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Sussex
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2007
Author: Anu Maarit Koskela
Dissertation Title: Vertical Polysemy: a study in the dynamicity of meaning
Linguistic Field(s):
Semantics
Dissertation Director:
Vyvyan Evans
M. Lynne Murphy
Dissertation Abstract:
The multiplicity of word meaning has been studied extensively, but the phenomenon of vertical polysemy has received relatively little attention. In vertical polysemy a lexical form is associated with multiple distinct senses that are in a relationship of categorial inclusion. Dog, for example, has a general 'canine' sense and a hyponymous 'male canine' meaning; similarly, the meaning of cup can either contrast with or include that of mug. This study examines the nature of this phenomenon and its motivations. Building on recent research in Cognitive Linguistics, this study takes as its basic assumptions that 1) word meanings are encyclopaedic in nature; 2) distinct word senses emerge dynamically in discourse situations, and 3) the distinctness of sense is a matter of degree. Given this Dynamic Meaning Construal view, this study argues that variation in category boundaries can amount to vertical polysemy if the broader and narrower construals constitute distinct communicatively useful sense categories. This means that vertical polysemy is fundamentally motivated by shared culturally or communicatively significant distinctions between more and less inclusive concepts. Vertical polysemy is shown to differ in various respects from horizontal polysemy, where word senses are related in other ways than by inclusion, often by metaphor or metonymy. In particular, a characterisation of the encyclopaedic knowledge structures that underlie vertically-related senses illustrates that vertical polysemy is not a type of metonymy, as has often been argued. The study also shows that it is possible to distinguish different types of vertical polysemes both in terms of the specific kind of inclusion relationship involved between the vertically-related senses and on the basis of the factors that motivate the emergence of broader or narrower senses. Through this, the study contributes towards research into the multiplicity and flexibility of word meaning and the role of categorial inclusion in lexical structure.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|