LINGUIST List 18.3826
Wed Dec 19 2007
TOC: Argumentation 21/3 (2007)
Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemeh
linguistlist.org>
Directory
1. Jasper de Vaal,
Argumentation Vol 21, No 3 (2007)
Message 1: Argumentation Vol 21, No 3 (2007)
Date:
18-Dec-2007
From:
Jasper de Vaal <jasper.devaal
springer.com>
Subject:
Argumentation Vol 21, No 3 (2007)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com
Journal Title: Argumentation
Volume Number: 21
Issue Number: 3
Issue Date: 2007
Subtitle: Metadialogues: Krabbe's Immanent Dialectic
Main Text:
Guest Editors: P. Houtlosser and Jan Albert van Laar
Metadialogues: Krabbe’s Immanent Dialectic
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9053-z
Authors Peter Houtlosser and Jan Albert van Laar
Agendas, Relevance and Dialogic Ascent
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9054-y
Author John Woods
Equivocation as a Point of Order
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9050-2
Author Jim Mackenzie
On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9052-0
Author Erik C. W. Krabbe
Countering Fallacious Moves
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9051-1
Authors Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
Arguments, Meta-arguments, and Metadialogues: A Reconstruction of Krabbe,
Govier, and Woods
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9055-x
Author Maurice A. Finocchiaro
Retraction and Revocation in Agent Deliberation Dialogs
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9057-8
Authors Peter McBurney and Simon Parsons
Metadialogues for Resolving Burden of Proof Disputes
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9056-9
Author Douglas N. Walton
Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9049-8
Author Jan Albert van Laar
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics
Pragmatics
Read more issues
|
LINGUIST home page
|
Top of issue
Print This Page
Please
report
any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage
|
Read LINGUIST
|
Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.