* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.533

Sun Feb 18 2007

Qs: Questionnaire of English Morphology

Editor for this issue: Jeremy Taylor <jeremylinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Ai-li Hsin, Questionnaire of English Morphology


Message 1: Questionnaire of English Morphology
Date: 18-Feb-2007
From: Ai-li Hsin <gealhsinnknucc.nknu.edu.tw>
Subject: Questionnaire of English Morphology


Hi,
I am an associate professor at National Koahsiung Normal University.
Currently I am working on Chinese EFL students' acquisition of English
morphological development. I need native speakers of English to help me
with a questionnaire to check if there are actually morphological rules in
native speakers' minds. And if yes, what are they?

If your mother tongue is English, would you like to help me with this task?

Ai-li Hsin

Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.